References 



Angermeier, P. A. and J.R. Karr. 1 986. Applying an index of biotic integrity based on stream fish communities: 



considerations in sampling and interpretation. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 6:418- 



429. 

 Baker, J.R and G.D. Merritt. 1991. Guidelines for preparing logistics plans. EPA 600/4-91/001. U.S. 



Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Las Vegas, Nevada. 

 Barbour, M.T., S.B. Stribling, and J.R. Karr. 1995. Multimetric approach for establishing biocriteria and 



measuring biological condition. Pp. 63-77 In: W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon (eds.), Biological Assessment and 



Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida. 

 Barbour, M.T., J. Gerrittsen, G.E. Griffith, R. Frydenborg, E. McCarron, J.S. White, and M.L. Bastian. 1996. 



A framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using benthic macro-invertebrates. Journal of the 



North American Benthological Society 1 5(2): 1 85-21 1 . 

 Chaloud, D.J. and D.V. Peck (eds.). 1994. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: Integrated 



quality assurance project plan for the Surface Waters Resource Group. EPA/600/X-91/080, Revision 2.00. 



U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada 

 DeShon, J.E. 1995. Development and application of the invertebrate community index (ICI). Pages 217-243. 



In: W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon (eds.). Biological assessment and criteria: Tools for water resource planning 



and decision making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida. 

 Diaz-Ramos, S., D.L. Stevens, Jr., and A.R. Olsen. 1996. EMAP Statistical Methods Manual. EPA620/R- 



96/002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC. 

 Environment Canada. 1991. Quality Assurance Guidelines for Biology in Aquatic Environment Protection. 



National Water Research Institute, Burlington, Ontario, Canada. 

 Fausch, K.D., J.R. Karrand P.R. Yant. 1984. Regional application of an index of biotic integrity based on 



stream fish communities. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 1 1 3: 39-55. 

 Fausch, K.D., J. Lyons, J.R. Karrand P. L. Angermeier. 1990. Fish communities as indicators of environmental 



degradation. Pages 123-144. InS.M. Adams (ed.). Biological indicators of stress in fish. American Fisheries 



Society Symposium 8. Bethesda, MD. 

 Fore, L.S., J.R. Karrand L.L. Conquest. 1994. Statistical properties of an index of biological integrity used to 



evaluate water resources. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:1077-1087. 

 Fore, L.S., J.R. Karr, and R.W. Wisseman. 1996. Assessing invertebrate responses to human activities, 



evaluating alternative approaches. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 1 5(2):21 2-231 . 

 Gammon, J.R., 1976. The fish populations of the middle 340km of the Wabash River. Purdue University 



Water Research Center Technical Report 86. Lafayette, IN. 

 Gibson, G.R. (Editor). 1994. Biological Criteria: Technical Guidance for Streams and Small Rivers. EPA 



822/B-94/001 . U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, DC. 

 Hoefs, N.J. and T.P. Boyle. 1992 Contribution offish community metrics to the index of biotic integrity in 



two Ozark rivers. Pages 283-303 In: D.H. McKenzie, D.E. Hyatt, and V.J. MacDonald (eds.), Ecological 



indicators. Volume 1 . Elsevier Applied Science, New York. 

 Hughes, R.M. and D. P. Larsen. 1988. Ecoregions: an approach to surface water protection. Journal of the 



Water Pollution Control Federation 60:486-493. 

 Hughes, R.M. 1993. Stream Indicator and Design Workshop. EPA/R-93/138. U.S. Environmental Protection 



Agency, Corvallis, Oregon. 

 Hughes, R.M, D.P. Larsen, and S.G. Paulsen. 1994. A strategy for developing and selecting biological 



condition indicators for EMAP-Surface Waters. Unpublished draft report, U.S. Environmental Protection 



Agency, Corvallis, Oregon. 

 Hughes, R.M. 1995. Defining acceptable biological status by comparing with reference conditions. Pages 



31-48 in W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon (eds.). Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource 



Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida. 



4-42 



