1865.] 103 



the primaries, so that it seeius better to retain Cramer's name for the 

 species, waiting for larger material, which might develop a variation 

 corresponding with Drury's figure and description. 

 " Charocampa thalassina, Clemens, 1. c. p. 150." 

 The habitat of this species is unknown. 

 " CkciTOcampa draneus, Clemens, 1. c. p. 151." 



Sphinx drancns Cramer, as before remarked, is stated by the origi- 

 nal illustrator of the species, to be from the "Indes Orientales." The 

 species does not seem to have been re-discovered since Cramer wrote, 

 certainly not from the West Indies. 

 " Pachylia Lyncea, Clemens, 1. c. p»l 59." 

 This species is probably distinct from P. Jicms, and, in this event, 

 should retain the name proposed by Dr. Clemens, who supposed the 

 specimen described to be the male of Linnaeus' species. 



" Sphinx scyron, Cramer, Vol. 4, p. 23, fig. 201," 



The specimens determined as Anceryx Scyron, by Mr. Walker in the 

 British Museum, probably belong to E. rimosa Grote. Cramer's figure 

 is too defective to hazard ought but conjecture as to the species in- 

 tended. 



"Hyloicus Dyn(zus, Htibner, Zutr., 3tes. Hund., p. 19, figs. 463, 464." 



This species, cited by Mr. Walker as a doubtful synonym to "-4ncc- 

 ryx ph'heia,'^ and by Dr. Clemens to ^' Dolba Hylaeus," is from Bahia 

 (Brazil) and, judging from the as usual excellent figures of Htibner, 

 represents a totally distinct species, hitherto undiscovered within the 

 geographical limits considered in the present " Catalogue." 



ERRATA. 



For " Chjerocampa," wherever we have used it ourselves, read " Chce- 

 rocampa." 



Page 160, line ".il, for "Am. Soc. Ent. Fr. t. 3.3ieme Ser.82," read 

 "Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr. t. 3, 3ieme ser. Bull. p. xxxii. (1855.)" 



