30 



20 



CVl 



en 



- 1.0 

 X 



< 







-1,0 



-1.0 



PHYTOPLANKTON 'OO' 

 MERL TANKS 



BAY INPUT WATER • 



37% VARIATION EXPLAINED 



'31' 



'21' 



^a'.'^'g 



■33' 



'2 3 



I, ' 



I 

 '29'9'36' 



75 2 7 

 838 6 



19' 



'10' 



'8' . 



'3' 

 7 '34' 



, , 50' 



52 43' 514' •^^ 



'15' 



4 

 '54' 



I • 

 1 

 3 6 



'51' 



'39' 



44' 

 20''24' 



' _• '9' ~" 



632;522 8 47'4a , 

 '33,13,2 ■23"53'28' 

 - " 42 22' 



■49' 3 y 7 



•37' 



'38'-2 6'2 4.9: 



10 



20 



AXIS I 



Figure 24-7. Correspondence Analysis on 49 Phytoplankton Species 



('00') in 9 MERL Microcosms (0) and Bay Input Water (•) from 



September 14, to December 6, 1976. 



NOTE: In some cases sample locations (microcosms) are closely adjacent and 

 not all of the 10 samples per microcosm are plotted. All variable locations 

 (phytoplankton species) are plotted as accurately as possible. Microcosm 

 location and phytoplankton species location were closely adjacent on the lower 

 right hand side of the figure until the first part of November when blooms 

 occurred in the bay and in the microcosms. The arrows indicate divergence 

 from non-bloom conditions to bloom conditions in November when variability 

 in species composition and microcosm behavior became greater. 



376 



