3. Berry, W. B. N. and R. M. Barker. 1968. Fossil Bivalve Shells Indicate 

 Longer Month and Year in Cretaceous than Present. Nature 217: 938. 



4. . 1975. Growth Increments in Fossil and Modern Bivalves. In: 

 Growth Rliythms and the History of the Earth's Rotation, Rosenberg, G. 

 D. and Runcorn, S. K. (eds.), Wiley, London, U. K. pp. 9-26. 



5. Bryan, G. W. 1969. The Effects of Oil-Spill Remover (Detergents) on the 

 Gastropod Nucella lapillus on a Rocky Shore and in the Laboratory. J. 

 Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 49: 1067. 



6. Coutts, P. J. F. 1970. Bivalve Growth Patterning as a Method of Seasonal 

 Dating in Archaeology. Nature 22(5:874. 



7. . 1975. The Seasonal Perspective of Marine-Oriented Prehistoric 

 Hunter-Gatherers. In: Growth Rhythms and the History of the Earth's 

 Rotation, Rosenberg, G. D. and Runcorn, S. K. (eds.), Wiley, London, U. 

 K. pp. 243-252. 



8. Crenshaw, M. A. and J. M. Neff. 1969. Decalcification at the Mantle-Shell 

 Interface in Molluscs. Amer. Zool. 9: 881. 



9. Cunhffe, J. E. and M. J. Kennish. 1974. Shell Growth Patterns in the 

 Hard- Shelled Clam. Underwater Nat. 5(4): 20. 



10. Dodd, J. R. 1964. Environmentally Controlled Variation in the Shell 

 Structure of a Pelecypod Species. J. Paleontol. 38: 1065. 



11. Dugal, L. P. 1939. The Use of Calcareous Shell to Buffer the Product of 

 Anaerobic Glycolysis in Venus mercenaria . J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 13: 235. 



12. Evans, J. W. and M. H. Lemessurier. 1972. Functional Micromorphology 

 and Circadian Growth of the Rock-Boring Clam, Penitella penita. Can. J. 

 Zool. 50: 1251. 



13. Farrow, G. E. 1971. Periodicity Structures in the Bivalve Shell: 

 Experiments to Estabhsh Growth Controls in Cerastoderma edule from the 

 Thames Estuary. Palaeontology 14: 571. 



14. . 1972. Periodicity Structures in the Bivalve Shell: Analysis of 

 Stunting in Cerastoderma edule from the Burry Inlet (South Wales). 

 Palaeontology 15: 61. 



173 



