Table 34. Two Way Coincidence Table Displaying a Hierarchical Clustering 

 of Similar Sites and Similar Biotic Parameters 



Biotic parameters 

 Group I Group I I Group I I I 



£) ^ *- 



Site 

 response 



group 



Shaviovik R 

 Ptielan Ck 

 Ugnuravik R 

 Kuparuk R 

 Ivishak R 

 M.F. Koyukuk R-DS 

 Nome R 

 Dietrich R-DS 



Kavik R 

 WcManus Ck 

 M.F. Koyukuk R-DS 

 Tanana R-OS 



Oregon Ck 

 Dietrich R-US 

 W.F. Tolovana R 

 Sagavan irk tok R 

 J im R 

 Prospect Ck 



Aufei s Ck 

 Tanana R-US 

 Penny R 



Gold Run Ck 

 Washington Ck 

 Sinuk R 

 Skeetercake Ck 



Symbols used for computer analysis were adapted from quantification 

 of change ratings ITable T- I ) as follows: (0,11 equals =; (2,31 equals 

 -; (4,5,61 equals b; (7,81 equals +; and 19,10) equals *. Note: all b's 

 (no response or weak response) were eliminated from this table to remove 

 c I utter. 



Responses by group were: 



A - essential ly no response. 



B - minor decreases in biotic parameter Group I; minor increases in 



biotic parameter Groups II and III. 



C - significant decrease in biotic Group I; minor decrease in biotic 



Group II; increase in biotic Group IM. 



D - significant decrease in biotic Group I; increase in biotic Group 



11; significant Increase in biotic Group III. 



E - decrease in biotic Group I; Increase in biotic Groups II and III. 



260 



