Common snook, continued 



Johnson, J.E. 1987. 

 States and Canada. 

 Bethesda, MD, 42 p. 



Protected fishes of the United 

 American Fisheries Society, 



Killam, K.A., R.J. Hochberg, and E.C. Rzemien. 1 992. 

 Synthesis of basic life histories of Tampa Bay species. 

 Tampa Bay National Estuary Program, Tech. Pub. No. 

 10-92. 



Kunneke, J.T., and T.F. Palik. 1984. Tampa Bay 

 environmental atlas. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 

 85(15), 73 p. 



Kushlan, J.A., and T.E. Lodge. 1974. Ecological and 

 distributional notes on the freshwater fish of southern 

 Florida. Fla. Sci. 37(2):1 10-128. 



Lau, S.R., and P.L. Shafland. 1982. Larval develop- 

 ment of snook, Centropomus undecimalis (Pisces; 

 Centropomidae). Copeia 1982:618-627. 



Lee, D.S., C.R. Gilbert, C.H. Hocutt, R.E. Jenkins, D.E. 

 McAllister, J.R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North 

 American Freshwater fishes. North Carolina St. Mus. 

 Nat. Hist., Raleigh, NC, 854 p. 



Limouzy, C.B. 1993. Effect of incubation temperature 

 on efficiency of yolk utilization by snook (Centropomus 

 undecimalis) (abstract). In Proc. Snook Symp., p. 22. 

 Mote Marine Lab., Sarasota, FL. 



Linton, T.L., and W.L. Rickards. 1965. Young common 

 snook on the coast of Georgia. Q. J. Fla. Acad. Sci. 

 28(2): 185-1 89. 



Loftus, W.F., and J. A. Kushlan. 1987. Freshwater 

 fishes of southern Florida. Bull. Fla. State Mus. Nat. 

 Hist. 31:147-344. 



Lunz, G.R. 1953. First record of the marine fish 

 Centropomus undecimalis in South Carolina. Copeia 

 1953:240. 



Manooch, C.S., III. 1984. Fishes of the Southeastern 

 United States. North Carolina State Museum of Natu- 

 ral History, Raleigh, NC, 362 p. 



- 



Marshall, A. R. 1958. A survey of the snook fishery of 

 Florida, with studies of the biology of the principal 

 species, Centropomus undecimalis. Fla. St. Board 

 Cons. Mar. Res. Lab., Tech. Ser. No. 22, 39 p. 



Martin, J.R. , and R.L. Shipp. 1971. Occurrence of 

 juvenile snook, Centropomus undecimalis, in North 

 Carolina waters. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 100(1):131- 

 132. 



Matheson, R.E.,andD.A. Rydene. 1993. Distribution 

 and seasonality of juvenile common snook, 

 Centropomus undecimalis, in the Little Manatee River, 

 Florida (abstract). In Proc. Snook Symp., p. 24. Mote 

 Marine Lab., Sarasota, FL. 



Matlock, G.C., and H.R.Osburn. 1987. Demise of the 

 snook fishery in Texas. Northeast Gulf Sci. 9(1 ):53-58. 



McMichael, R.H., Jr., K.M. Peters, and G.R. Parsons. 

 1989. Early life history of the snook, Centropomus 

 undecimalis, in Tampa Bay, Florida. Northeast Gulf 

 Sci., 10(2):1 13-125. 



Merriner, J.V., W.T. Hogarth, and W.A. Foster. 1970. 

 Occurrence of the common snook, Centropomus 

 undecimalis (Bloch) (Pisces-Centropomidae), in North 

 Carolina waters. J. Elisha Mitch. Soc. 86:194-195. 



Mote Marine Laboratory (Mote). 1993. Proc. Snook 

 Symp., April 1 5-1 6, 1 993. Mote Marine Lab., Sarasota, 

 FL. 39 p. 



Moe, M.A.,Jr. 1972. Movement and migration of south 

 Florida fishes. Fla. St. Board Cons. Tech. Ser. 69, 26 

 P- 



Nelson, D.M. (ed.)., M.E. Monaco, CD. Williams, T.E. 

 Czapla, M.E. Pattillo, L. Coston-Clements, L.R. Settle, 

 and E.A. Irlandi. 1992. Distribution and abundance of 

 fishes and invertebrates in Gulf of Mexico estuaries, 

 Vol. I: Data summaries. ELMR Rep. No. 10. NOAA/ 

 NOS SEA Div., Rockville, MD, 273 p. 



NOAA (National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration). 

 1985. Gulf of Mexico Coastal and Ocean Zones 

 Strategic Assessment: Data Atlas. NOAA NOS Strate- 

 gic Assessment Branch, Rockville, MD. 



Odum.W.E. 1971. Pathways of energy flow in a south 

 Florida estuary. Univ. Miami Sea Grant Tech. Bull. No. 

 7, 162 p. 



Palik, T.F., and J.T. Kunneke. 1984. Northwestern 

 Florida ecological characterization: an ecological at- 

 las. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. FWS/OBS-82/47.1. U.S. 

 Min. Manag. Serv. 85-0011. 



Perez-Pinzon, M.A., and P.L. Lutz. Activity related cost 

 of osmoregulation in the juvenile snook (Centropomus 

 undecimalis). Bull. Mar. Sci. 48:58-66. 



200 



