NOVITATES ZOOLOGICAE XXV. 1918. 227 



Sapporo Yezzo, June 1890, 9 (JcJ, 4 $? Ishikishiri Yezzo, June 1890 (Dr. Fritze) ; 

 <J 1 Tokio, July 1S91 (Dr. Fritze) ; 1 <J, 1 ? Mukoyama, May 1896 ; 18 SS, 4 9? 

 Nikko, May 1888 and 1898. 



Pamassius stubbendorfii subsp. ? 



This form differs from st. citrinarius in the dark marks being duskier and 

 much more extended ; the S wing being even more heavily marked than most 

 citrinarius. 



$. Too few specimens are known for a proper definition (I believe only 3 

 are on record). 



1 S Ichang (Yankowsky). 



Pamassius stubbendorfii tsingta:a Bang-Haas. 



Parnassius stubbetidorfii var. tsingtaua, Bang-Haas, Iris, vol. xxiv. p. 28 (1910) (Tsingtau.). 



cJ. Larger, than st. citrinarius, whiter, black on nervures and ceUular and 

 discoidal dark patches more extended. 



?. Larger, black almost as extended as in st. .stubbendorfii ab. melanophia. 

 Length of forewing : S citrinarius 36 mm., tsingtaua 41 mm. 

 ? „ 39 „ „ 42 mm. 



Expanse „ 3 „ 76 „ „ 86 mm. 



? ,„ 82 „ „ 88 mm. 



3 <J<J, 2 ?? Tsingtau, N. China. 



Famassias felderi Brem. 



Parnassius felderi Bremer, Bull. Acad. Imp. Sciences St. Petersb. vol. iii. p. 464 (1861). 



5 (J(J, 1 S 1 ; 2 <J<J, 1 $ Amur, ex coll. Felder (1 <?, 1 ? marked " Type ") ; 

 2 (JcJ, 3 $9 Amur; 1 bought of Tancre, marked "ex as. occ." ; 5 (J (J, 9 ?$ 

 Pompejefka, 40 kilometres south of Radde Chingan Mountains, June 1910 

 (W. Mau) ; 2 33, 4 ?? Radefka, May (Tancre). 



Among the series of [J (J is one from Radefka whicli would be indistinguish- 

 able from St. citrinarius were it not for the remains of the dusky spot above 

 tornus of hindwing, and the dusky bar from middle of inner margin of forewing 

 to just above vein 1. 



Ab. atrata Graeser. 



Of this aberration there are 5 $$ in the series and several intermediates. 



Parnassius eversmanni Menet. 

 Pamassius eversmanni eversmanni Menet. 



Panwssius eversrrmnni Men^tries in Simaschkotf, Ru.fsk. Fauna, pi. 4. f. 5 (1849). 



In 1909 I united litoreus Stichel with ev. eversmanni on the evidence of 

 several specimens in my own and the British Museum's collections labelled 

 " Amur." I have since seen a large series from Nicolajewsk, Amur, of which 

 8 are now in the Tring Museum. I am now convinced that the specimens 

 labelled " Amur " have a wrong locality and that litoreus is a good local race. 



2 (?(J, 1 ? " Amur " (loc. err. !) ; 3 33,2 $$ Central Southern Siberia ; 2 33, 

 2 ?$ Siberia ; 1 3 Irkutsk ; I 3 Wilim ; 1 ? East Sajan. 



