( 284 ) 



Besides many differences in pattern, the greater size, and the much more arched 

 costal margin of the forewings, P. (jiijon Feld. is distinguished from P. demolion 

 Cram, by the totally differently shaped cell of the hindwings, which at once shows 

 that P. gigon Feld. cannot be considered a variety of P. demolion Cram., as Snellen 

 (I.e.) suggests. 



The veins traversing the band of the forewings are black above, like the rest 

 of the wing, except the submedian nervure, which is in most examples partly of the 

 colour of the band. On the hindwings above there is often a rather largi> spot between 

 the subcostal and upper discocellular nervules, especially in the feiaales. 



The subinarginal spots on the underside of the forewings are very variable; they 

 are often joined to one another and form a zigzag band. 



Hah. Celebes (14 (?, 3 ?); Sulla Islands; Mangola (1 J, 1 ?); Siao Islands: 

 Sangir Island (1 ?); Talaut Island (2 J). 



70. Papilio antonio Hew. [<?,?]. 



Piipilii) anlnnio Hewitsou, Exot. Butt. V., I'n/i. t. 14. f. 4G ((J, upperside) (1875) (Mindanao) : 



Haase, Untersiich. Ub. Mim. p. .'iO (1893). 

 Pajiilio (Aramiiita) antonio, Semper, /'liilipp., TtiqftiU. p. 274. n. 400. t. 47. f. 4 (jj, underside) 



(1892) (cJ, ? ; Mindanao). 



The median band of the hindwings of P. demolion Cram, is in /'. antonio Hew. 

 indicated above at the abdominal margin by a white spot ; sometimes there is another 

 spot between the lower median nervules. On the underside of the forewings the 

 triangular mark is continued towards the apex of the wing by some minute white 

 spots. In the female the white mark of the forewings is longer than in the male. 



Hah. Mindanao (3 c?). 



71. Papilio noblei Xicdv. [<?]. 



(J. PapiUo noblei Nic^ville, Journ. .U. Su,: Bun/, p. 287. n. 19. t. i:!. f. 2 (<J) (1888) (Karen Hills, 

 Burma) ; Semp., Philipp., Tagfalt. p. 275. sub n. 400 (1892) ; Haase, UnUrmch. iih. Mim. 

 p. 40 (1893). 



(J. Papilio henrirus Oberthiu", Et. d'Ent. XVI. p. 3. t. 4. f. 39 (J) (1893) (Mouong-Mou, Tonkin). 



Differs from P. antonio Hew. chiefly in the white triangular mark of the fore- 

 wings being obliterated. 



According to the figm-es, P. henricus Oberth. is the same as P. noblei Nicdv. ; a 

 few slight differences in the figures are certainly individual. 



Ilab. Burma ; Tonkin. 



72. Papilio helenus L. [<?,?, larva, jiupa]. 



Ehret, Plant, ac Pap. t. 10 (1748-59). 



Papilin Eques Trojanus helenus Linn^, Sysl. Nat. ed. x. p. 459. n. 4 (I7.")8) (Asia) ; Clerck, Icon. 

 Ins. I. t. 13. f. 2 (1759) ; Linne, .Uus. Lurl. Ulr. p. 185. n. 4 (17(54) (Ind, or.) ; Houtt., Nat. 

 //«M. 11. p. 191. n.4.t.87.f. 1 (underside) (1 767) (China) : Linm'', %,^^ .V«(. ed. xii. p. 74.'). n. 4 

 (1767) ; Mull., Naturit. V. 1. p. 567. u. 4. t. 17. f. 1 (1774) (China) : Fabr., Syst. Enl. p. 443. ii. 5 

 (1775) (p.p.) ; Cramer, Pap. Ex. II. p. 90. 1. 153. f. a. n (1777) (China) ; Goeze, Eiit. liei/li: III. 1. 

 p. 30. n. 4 (1779) (excl. cit. Sebae) ; Fabr., Spec. Iuk. U. p. 3. n. 7 (1780) (p.p.) ; Esper, Aiisl. 

 Sriimell. p. 18. n. 4. t. 2. f. 2 (1784) ; Jablonsky, Nature. .SV/im. II. p. 166. n. 40. t. 14. f. 4 ((J) 

 (1784) ; Fabr., Munt. Ins. II. p. 1. n. 3 (1787) (p.p:)  Gmelin, S,/st. Nat. ed. xiii. I. 5. p. 2226. 

 n. 4 (1790) (p.ji.) ; Fabr., Ent. Syxl. III. 1. p. 2. n. 3 (1793) (/;.;;.). 



Papilio helmus, Godart, Enr. Mith. IX. p. 68. n. 117 (1819) (China) ; Boisd., Spec. Gin. Lip.l. p. 211. 

 n. 25 (1836) (/j.p.) ; Doubl. Westw. * Hew., Gen. JJiiirn. Lrp. I. p. 11. n. 57 (1846) (p.p.) : 

 Gray, Cat. Lep. Ins. B. .M. I. p. 18.. n. 77 (1852) (N. India ; China) ; id.. List hep. Ins. B. .1/. I. 

 p. 21. D. 81 (1856) (syn.p.p.) ; Horsf. & Moore, Cat. Lep. Ins. Mus. E. I. C. I. p li'l. n. 205 



