distribution, current impacts and 

 behavior and fate of toxics and nu- 

 trients. This information will pro- 

 vide a baseline description of the 

 estuarine system against which future 

 changes can be measured, and possible 

 control measures assessed. 



Program. U.S. E.P.A. 

 68-01-4144; 1980. 



Contrib. 



PREFERENCES 



Hartigan, J. P., Jr. A modeling study 

 of nonpoint pollution loadings 

 and transport in the Chesapeake 

 Bay basin. Work Plan of North- 

 ern Virginia Planning District 

 Commission; 1980. 



Lang, D.J.; Grason, D. 1980. Water 

 quality monitoring of three ma- 

 jor tributaries to the Chesa- 

 peake Bay - interim data report. 

 U.S. Geological Survey Water 

 Resources Investigations; 1980: 

 80-78. 



Mason, B. J. ; McFadden, J.E. Landuse 

 and point sources in the Chesa- 

 peake Bay Study area. Annapo- 

 lis, MD: U.S. Environmental Pro- 

 tection Agency, Chesapeake Bay 



Overton, D.E.; Meadows, M.E. Storm- 

 water modelling. New York: Aca- 

 demic Press; 1976. 



Pheiffer, T.H. et al. Eutrophica- 

 tion work program for Chesapeake 

 Bay; 1977. Report of Eutroph- 

 ication Work Group. 



Pritchard, D.W. Observations of cir- 

 culation in coastal plain estu- 

 aries. Lauff, G. ed. Estuaries 

 Washington, DC: American As- 

 sociation Advancement Science. 

 1967: 37-44. 



Smullen, J.E. A water quality assess- 

 ment methodology for the Chesa- 

 peake Bay watersheds. Working 

 Paper, Chesapeake Bay Program, 

 EPA; 1980. 



U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

 Office of Research and Develop- 

 ment. Research Summary, Chesa- 

 peake Bay. 1980; EPA-600/8-80- 

 019. 



Water Quality of the Upper Great 

 Lakes, IJC Report to the Govern- 

 ments of Canada and the U.S., 

 May 1974; 91 p. 



199 



