two remarkable ascomycetes. 433 



Literature Cited. 

 Berkeley, M. J. 



1860. Outlines of British Fungology. Hypocrea riccioidea 

 Bolton. On ^Yillow. p. 383. 

 Bolton, J. 



1791. Appendix (Vol. IV) to History of Funguses Growing 

 about Halifax, p. 1S2, pi. 182. ' 

 Ellis, J. B., and Everhart, B. M. 



1885. New P\mgi. Journal of Mycology. Vol. I, p. 42, March. 

 1892. The North American Pyrenomycetes. p. 87, pi. 11. 

 Karsten, P. A. 



1873. Mycologia Fenniae. In Bidrag till Kannedom af Fin-, 

 lands Natur och Folk. Finska Vetenskaps-Societaten. 

 Tjugondetredje Haftet. pp. 221 and 251. Helsingfors. 

 Hbhnel, F. von. 



1912. Fragmenta zur Mycologie XIV, p. 379. Sitz. der k.k. 

 Akad. Wiss. in Wien. For further mention of Hypo- 

 creopsis by this author see the same IX (1909) p. 1479 

 and XIII (1911), p. 451, in which the genus is compared 

 with Endothia, etc. 

 Montagne, J. F. Cam. 



1836. Notices sur les Plantes Cryptogames. Ann. des Sciences. 



Nat. II Ser., Vol. VI, p. 333, Plate 18, fig. 4. 

 1856. ."-iylloge Cryptogamarum etc. p. 210. 

 Saccardo, P. A. 



1891, 1902. The names included by Saccardo under Hypo-, 

 creopsis will be found in the 9th and 16th volumes of the- 

 Sylloge, pages 980 and 590. 

 Seaver, Fred. J. 



1910, a. Hypocreales of North America. Mycologia, vol. II, p. 82. 

 1910, b. Hypocreales in North American Flora. Ill, i, p. 45. 

 Scopoli, J. A. 



1760. Flora Carniohca, p. 109. 



1772. The same, second edition, vol. II, p. 393. Lichen Phy-. 

 sodes var. 1. 

 Tode, H. I. 



1790. Fungi Mecklenburgenses Selecti. Fasciculus, p. 9. 



Note. The writer desires to express his obligation to ]\Ir. George. 

 Nelson of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, for the admirable. 

 I>hotographs from which the two accompanying plates have been made,. 



