566 Bulletin 78. 



1893. Meade, Ent. Mo. Mag., XXIX., 219. Comments on Stein's paper, 

 and accepts villipes Z&it.=^floccosa ; but says nothing of Stein's separation 

 oifloccosa horn JI oralis Fall. 



Phorbia floralis Fallen. 



of Meigen, Zetterstedt, Schiner, and others.* 



1826. Meigen, Syst. Besch. Insek., V., 165. Description of adults. 



1834. Bouche, Natur. der Insek., bes. als Larv. u. Pup., p. 77. Larva and 



pupa described. 

 1845. Zetterstedt, Dipt. Scand., IV., 1536, 147. Description. 

 1853. Walker, Insect. Brittan., Diptera, II., 142. Describes it as common 



in England. 

 1862, Schiner, Fauna Austriaca, I., 646. Description from a Zetterstedt 



type specimen. 

 1872. Weyenbergh, Tijd. voor Ent. Nederl. Ent. Ver. Leiden, 2d ser., 



VIII., p. 131. Descriptions of the different stages, with habits and life 



history as a Radish pest. One plate of fairly good figures. 

 1880. Taschenberg, Prak. Insektenkunde, part IV., p. 132. Describes 



adults, and compiles Bouche's descriptions of the larva and pupa- 



(Bouche, however, does not say : " Also stark schwarz gekornelt"). 



1882. Lintner, First Rept., p. 207. Mentioned. 



1883. Meade, Ent. Mo. Mag., XIX., p. 214. Mentioned. 



villipes Zetterstedt. 



1883. Ormerod, Rept. for 1882. p. id. Brief account. 



1884. Ormerod, Rept. for 1883, p. 10-17. Brief account of life history, with 

 general discussion of remedies. 



1890. Ormerod, Man. of Inj. Insects, p. 25. Brief account. 



1893. Ormerod Rept. for 1892, p. 146. Brief account. 



1845. Zetterstedt, Dipt. Scand., IV., 1456, 67. Original description. 



1862. Schiner, Fauna Austriaca, I., 650. Quotes Zetterstedt. 



1883. Verrall, Ent. Mo. Mag., XIX., 224. Places villipes as a synonym. 



1892. Stein, Ent. Nachr., XVIII., 324. Synonym. 



1893. Meade Ent. Mo Mag., XXIX., 219. Mentioned. 



*In 1883. Meade had but little doubt WizXfloccosa Macq was the same as the M. floralis 

 of Fallen, Meigen, Ze'.terstedt, Schiner, and others : and (nothwithstanding Stein's separ- 

 ation of the species ba ed upon an examination of Fallen's type) August 31, 1S94, he writes 

 me that he thinks that the floralis of Fallen, Meigen, and Zetterstedt is the .«anie as floe. 

 cosa Macq. I believe the floralis of the authors mentioned above and others, except FaL 

 lea, is the sameas A)<7M/ca« Bouche : therefore such references are here given a place in 

 the syuonomy. Fallen described his y/o;o/w in 1S24 1 Monog. muse. Sueciae, part VII., p. 

 71, No. 76. In Hagen's Bib. Elnt. the date of this part is given as 1S24, but Schiner quotes 

 1820). Meigen's description antedates Bouche's brassicae by 7 years; but, as Stein has 

 shown, floralis is now occupied in the same genus hy floralis Fallen, thus the rules of no- 

 menclature require us to accept Bouche's name, even though Meigen described the same 

 insect under another name several years before. 'Sla.cquaLrV s flora lis seems to be different 

 All the aut'iors refer the species to genus Anihomyia. 



