MOLL use A 397 



(3) Helicina rotcUoidea Mighels. 



Helicina rotelloidea Mighels, P. Boston Soc. 11. (1845), p. 19 ; Pfeiffer, Conch. - 



Cab. Helicina, p. 23, pi. iii. fig. 40 — 3. 

 Helicina bronniana Philippi, Zeitsch. Malak. iv. (1847), p. 124. 

 Hab. Oahu (Mighels, &c.). 



(4) Helicina sandivichiensis Souleyet. 



Helicina sandwichiensis Souleyet, Voy. Bonite, Zool. 11. (1852), p. 529, pi. xxx. 



figs. 1—5. 

 nee ? H. sandivicJiiensis Sowerby, Thes. Conch, iii. pi. CCLXX. figs. 173 — 4. 



A variety "^" has been recorded by Pfeiffer as from the Loyalty Islands; 

 probably this is an error. See Crosse, J. Conchyl. xlii. p. 405. 



Hab. Oahu, Waianae Mts. (Baldwin) ; at and below Kaala (Perkins). 



(5) Helicina tiberta Gould. 



Helicina iiberta Gould, P. Boston Soc. 11. (1847), p. 202 ; U. S. Explor. Exped. 

 Moll. pi. VII. fig. 1 14. 



Hab. Maui and Oahu (Gould). — Oahu, below Kaala (Perkins). 



Species doubtful or erroneously recorded. 



Helicina a7itoni'?{&\ii&T. Originally recorded without locality; subsequently Pfeiffer 

 gave the Hawaiian Islands and the Gamblers. It really appears to come from 

 Honduras, and the Hawaiian habitat is probably erroneous, these supposed Hawaiian 

 specimens belonging, as undoubtedly the Gambler Island shells do, to H. pazi Crosse 

 (J. Conchyl. xiii. p. 221, pi. vi. fig. 8). 



Helicina crassilabris, Philippi. It has been suggested by Pfeiffer that this is 

 Hawaiian, but it really comes from Venezuela or the Caribbean Region. 



Helicina fjilgoj-a Gould, originally described from Manua, Samoa Islands; it has 

 also been noted, but, I think, erroneously, from the Hawaiian Islands. 



Helicina pisum Philippi. I think "Sandwich Is." must have been a mistake and 

 possibly refers to Vate or Sandwich I.: it may be a slip for Savage I., from which 

 specimens, inseparable from this, undoubtedly do come. This appears not to be the 

 H. pisum Hombr. and Jacq., which equals H. taliitensis Pease. 



