Superfamily ICHNEUMONOIDEA 647 



Biology: Kaufman, 1939. Ztschr. f. Angew. Ent. 26: 421-422 (as corvina, misdet.). — Baccetti, 

 1958. Redia 43: 226-253 (as corvina, misdet.). — Brunson and Coles, 1968. U. S. Dept. Agr., 

 Prod. Res. Rpt. 101: 3-4, 7 (releases). —Day, 1970. Jour. Econ. Ent. 63: 586-589 (value of 

 jumping cocoons). —Morrison and Pass, 1974. Jour. Econ. Ent. 67: 141-142. — Dysart and 

 Day, 1976. U. S. Dept. Agr., Prod. Res. Rpt. 167: 2-3, 9-14, 39, 44-45 (releases and 

 recoveries). — Gordh and Hendrickson, 1976. Ent. News 87: 271-274 (sexual behavior). 

 —Dysart and Bingham, 1977. Coop. Plant Protect. Rpt. 2: 24-26 (recoveries). — Yeargan 

 and Latheef, 1977. Environmental Ent. 6: 31-34. 

 bryanti Viereck. Southern Alta. Known only from the holotype, which was collected at Bilby, 

 Alta. 

 Bathypledes bryanti Viereck, 1925; 1926. Canad. Ent. 57 (9): 225 (key); 58 (9): 223. 9. In 

 the 1926 part of Viereck's revision as "Campoplex (Bathypledes) bryanti;" nowhere in 

 the 1925 part of the revision was Bathypledes indicated to be a subgenus of 

 Campoplex. 

 curculionis (Thomson). Southern Que. w. to s. Alta. and Wash., s. to n. Ga., n. Miss., Europe, n. 

 Africa. Introduced. Host: Hypera brunneipennis Boh., H. plantaginis (DeG.), H. postica 

 (Gyll). The lectotype selected by Townes, Momoi, and Townes (1965) may not pertain to 

 the present species (see Horstmann , 1974). Thomson probably had no reared material, 

 but indicated that curculionis is the species which Holmgren (1860) had misidentified as 

 subciiidus (Gravenhorst). Under subcinctus, Holmgren in turn referred to Ratzeburg 

 (1852, p. 82; cf. Ratzeburg, 1848, p. 82) who cited hosts of reared specimens. Specimens 

 reared from H. postica and H. plantaginis were identified by Horstmann (1974) as var. 

 1 of B. curculionis. B. brevitor Aubert (1974) was described as a species related to 

 curculionis, the description of brevitor being based upon two Yugoslavian specimens 

 reared from H. plantaginis. If curculionis var. 1 of Horstmann (1974) proves not to be 

 conspecific with curculionis, it seems probable that brevitor will prove to be the correct 

 name for it. 

 Canidia curculionis Thomson, 1887. Opusc. Ent. 11: 1113. 9. Aubert (1960) gave 

 descriptive notes concerning a female in the Thomson collection which he regarded as 

 being the lectotype, but he did not cite a locality or other information pertaining to the 

 labeling of that specimen; Townes, Momoi, and Townes (1965) selected a female 

 lectotype from Stehag, Skane, Sweden, which had been labeled as lectotype by Aubert. 



Taxonomy: Holmgren, 1860 (1858). Svenska Vetensk.-Akad. Handl. (n. f.) 2 (8): 103-104. 

 —Aubert, 1960. Vie et Milieu 11: 490. —Townes, Momoi, and Townes, 1965. Amer. Ent. 

 Inst., Mem. 5: 282. —Aubert, 1966. Opusc. Ent. 31: 130. —Aubert, 1974. Soc. Ent. de 

 Mulhouse, Bui. 30: 2 (brevitor described). — Horstman, 1974. Ent. Germ. 1: 62, 73, 74-75. 



Biology: Ratzeburg, 1848; 1852. Ichn. d. Forstins., v. 2, p. 82; v. 3, p. 82. —Webster, 1912. U. 

 S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent., Bui. 112: 38. -Hagan, 1919. Calif. Dept. Agr., Monthly Bui. 8: 470. 

 —List and Wakeland, 1919. Colo. State Ent., Cir. 24: 34. — Wakeland, 1920. Colo. State 

 Ent., Cir. 28: 28. — Chamberlin, 1924. U. S. Dept. Agr., Dept. Cir. 301: 4, 6. — Chamberlin, 

 1926. Jour. Econ. Ent. 19: 302-310. —Newton, 1933. Colo. Agr. Col., Bui. 399: 18. 

 — Sorenson, 1934. Utah Acad. Sci., Proc. 11: 249-251. — Michelbacher and Essig, 1934. Jour. 

 Econ. Ent. 27: 965. —Essig. and Michelbacher, 1934. Calif. Univ., Agr. Expt. Sta., Bui. 567: 

 63-67. — Keifer, 1935. Calif. Dept. Agr., Monthly Bui. 24: 350. —Michelbacher, 1936. Calif. 

 Dept. Agr., Monthly Bui. 25: 392. -Kaufman, 1939. Ztschr. f. Angew. Ent. 26: 422-424. 

 —Michelbacher, 1940. Hilgardia 13: 81-99. —Michelbacher, 1940. Jour. Econ. Ent. 33: 

 892-895. -Schweis, 1942. Nev. State Dept. Agr., Bien. Rpt. (for 1940-1942), p. 33. 

 —Michelbacher, 1943. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta., Bui. 677: 5, 10-20. -Hamlin, McDuffie, 

 Lieberman, and Bunn, 1943. U. S. Dept. Agr., Farmers Bui. 1930: 6-8. —Hamlin, 

 Lieberman, Bunn, McDuffie, Newton, and Jones, 1949. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bui. 975: 

 41-55. —van den Bosch, 1953. Jour. Econ. Ent. 46: 161-162. — Milliron, 1956. Jour. Econ. 

 Ent. 49: 443. — Hobbs, Nummi and Virostek, 1959. Canad. Ent. 91: 562, 564-565. —van den 

 Bosch and Dietrick, 1959. Ent. Soc. Amer., Ann. 52: 609-616. —Fisher, Schlinger, and van 

 den Bosch, 1961. Jour. Econ. Ent. 54: 196. —Puttier, Jones, and Coles, 1961. Jour. Econ. 

 Ent. 54: 878-880. —Coles and Puttier, 1963. Jour. Econ. Ent. 56: 609. —van den Bosch, 

 1964. Jour. Econ. Ent. 57: 195-196. —Dysart and Puttier, 1965. Jour. Econ. Ent. 58: 



