278 ALLAN HANCOCK PACIFIC EXPEDITIONS VOL. 18 



not Pontharpinia rostrata, K. H. Barnard 1931: 119, fig. 1 (==P. barn- 



ardi,fide Pirlot 1932). 



Remarks. — The figures by Pirlot 1932 correspond favorably with 

 those of Dana 1853 and there is little doubt that Pirlot had Dana's 

 species. Although the measured proportions of some of the articles of 

 peraeopods 3, 4, 5 do not compare properly, this may be attributed to 

 slight exaggerations on Dana's small figures. 



It is most important to rediscover 'Phoxus Batei' of Haswell 1879 

 and determine that it is, indeed, P. rostratus, as it would appear to be 

 from the literature. The types apparently are not in the Australian 

 Museum and labeled specimens there belong to another species (see 

 my Paraphoxus sp. Australia) . 



The occurrence of this species in the Falkland Islands as written by 

 Stebbing 1914 is questionable, because of geography and temperature. 



Distribution. — Sulu Sea; Port Jackson, Australia; coast south of 

 Manipa Island. 



Paraphoxus rotundifrons (K. H. Barnard), new combination 



Parharpinia rotundifrons K. H. Barnard 1932: 104, fig. 53. 

 Pontharpinia {rotundifrons) ?, Stephensen 1947: 44-45, fig. 17. 



Distribution. — South Georgia, 18-235 m; South Sandwish Islands; 

 South Shetland Islands, Deception. 



Paraphoxus simplex (Gurjanova), new combination 



Parharpinia simplex Gurjanova 1938: 272-274, 385-386, fig. 10. 

 Pararpinia (sic) simplex, Gurjanova 1951: 392-394, fig. 238. 

 Distribution. — Japan Sea. 



Paraphoxus sinuatus (K. H. Barnard) 



(Plate 45) 



Parharpinia sinuata K. H. Barnard 1932: 103-104, fig. 52. 

 Parharpinia villosa, Schellenberg 1931: 75-78, fig. 39; (not Haswell 



1879) ; Schellenberg 1935: 232. 

 Paraphoxus sinuatus, J. L. Barnard 1958 : 147-148. 



Diagnosis of female. — Head rather large, broad basally, the rather 

 long rostrum tapering anteriorly; eyes medium in size, roundish. Body 

 somewhat slender. 



