34 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY I3TH ANNUAL REPORT 



rather definitely limited in their vertical distribution, and their 

 careful discrimination should make possible a definite placing of 

 these in their proper geological horizon. The various formations 

 shown by the foraminifera will be discussed in the notes that fol- 

 low. The location of the wells from which material was used are 

 given in the following list and the accompanying map shows their 

 distribution in the state. In the systematic portion of this paper 

 references are given to the original descriptions and to published 

 figures with a more complete reference to the distri1)ution in tlie 

 Coastal Plain area and that of the West Indies, both of which are 

 related to the Florida well material. 



The approximate locations of the wells, and the depths from 

 which the material studied was obtained, are as follows, the num- 

 bers corresponding with those on the map. More detailed informa- 

 tion about each was given in the previous paper and need not be 

 repeated here. Samples were studied from the entire depth of the 

 well unless otherwise indicated. 



1. Panama City, Washington County, 470 feet. 



2. Bonheur Development Co., near Burns, Wakulla County, 

 2,153 feet. 



3. Jacksonville, Duval County, 980 feet. 



4. St. Augustine, St. John's County, 160 to 1.051 feet. 



5. Anthony, Marion County, 50 to 500 feet. 



6. Eustis, Lake County, 100 to 180 feet. 



7. Bushnell, Sumter County, 380 to 3,080 feet. 



8. Apopka, Orange County, 50 to 390 feet. 



9. Sanford, Seminole County, 95 to 113 feet. 



10. Cocoa, Brevard County, a sample from 190 feet. 



1 1 . Tiger Bay, Polk County, 30 to 770 feet. 



12. Okeechobee. Okeechobee County, 41 to* 500 feet. 



13. Boca Grande, Lee County, one inadequate sample. 



14. Fort Myers, Lee County, 200 to 950 feet. 

 IS- Marathon, Monroe County, 2,300 feet. 



