98 Writings of Edivai'd L. G^^eene. [zoe 



Californica Benth. — the latter itself considered by Dr, Gray only 

 a form of 6". bullata Benth. 



Chorizanthe Nortoni Greene is a variety of C. Doicglasii 

 Benth. 



Eriogomim grayide & rithescens Greene are mere variations of 

 E. nudum Dougl. 



Eriogomim molle Greene described as "not in flower" has 

 since been collected in better specimens and proves to be E. 

 giganteum Wats. 



Ef-iogomim robustiim Greene* is the form of E. Lobbii growing 

 at lower elevation. The type of E. robiistum, collected by the 

 writer, was found at about 4,500 feet. 



Eriogomim elegans Greene is one of the forms of either E. 

 gracile Benth. or E. Baileyi Wats. E. Baileyi as everyone 

 knows was formerly termed " ^5". gracile var. effusum,'" and 

 there are numerous forms now known which can be referred 

 equally well to either. Mr. Greene's reason for comparing it to 

 the suffrutescent E. saxatile cannot be conjectured. 



Eriogomim agnimim Greene judging from the imperfect 

 character is E. gracile var. leucocladon {E. leucocladon Benth.). 



Eriogomim Davidsonii Greene Pitt, ii, 295 was reduced by 

 the author in "Errata" a few pages further on in the line 

 ^^ Eriogomim Davidso7iii=E. violeshun Wats." 



Eriogomim taxifolimn Greene has by other botanists always 

 been considered a form of E. Wrightii Torr. 



Pierostegia galioides\ Greene is P. viacroptera Benth. 



Pierostegia fruticosa\ Greene {Har/ordia fruticosa,X Greene & 

 Parry) is apparently only an insular variety of the same. 



Atriplex dilatata Greene is A. Barclay ana (Benth.) 



Atriplex nodosa Greene is A. expansa Wats. It was described 

 from a single old and fragmentary specimen collected by the 

 writer. A. expansa often shows two strikingly different forms 

 of fruit in the same plant. 



Aviarantiis carneiis Greene is probably an introduced weed. 

 It may be A. polygonoides I^., though from the very imperfect 



*Bull. Cal. Acad, i, 126. 

 t Bull. Cal. Acad, i, 212-13. 

 X Proc. Dav. Acad, v, 26. 



