XVII SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS $97 



ably all secondary, the Pteridoj)hytes show four types of i^ameto- 

 phyte. Hie first, represented by most iKjniosporous b^erns, is 

 the familiar heart-sha])e(l ])rothal]ium, which strr^n^ly recalls 

 the simpler anacro,£^ynous Jun<^ermanniacece or Dcndroceros; 

 the second is the lobed prothallinm of Eqtiischmi, which resem- 

 bles most nearly amonc^ the Liverworts such forms as Antho- 

 ceros fiisiformis, but has an analogy also in the lr)bed prothallia 

 sometimes met witli in Osiminda. In some species of Trich- 

 oinancs and Scliizcca there occur the branched filamentous pro- 

 thallia, which some authors look upon as an indication of direct 

 relationship with forms intermediate between AlgcC and Musci- 

 nese. As other species of TricJwinancs have the same type of 

 prothallium as the other Ferns, and this is always true of the 

 closely related genus HymenophyUuui, this view is open to 

 question. The green prothallium of Lycopodium ccrmium dif- 

 fers from the somewhat similar one of Equisctinn, in the essen- 

 tial point that in the former we have to do with a radial 

 structure, in the latter with a dorsiventral one. The upright 

 gametophyte of Lycopodiiiin, with its terminal circle of leaf-like 

 lobes, might be compared to a leafy Moss-shoot, although it is 

 hardly probable that this resemblance is more than superficial. 



As far as the form and growth of the prothallium are con- 

 cerned, all forms except Lycopodmin could be traced back to 

 the Anthocerotes ; the Fern type to forms like Dcndroceros or 

 Anthoceros Iccvis, the Equisctinu type more resembling A. fusi- 

 formis. The difference in the character of the chromatophores 

 is a very important one, and at present must forbid the assump- 

 tion of any immediate connection between the Anthocerotes 

 and existing Pteridophytes. Whether the occasional appear- 

 ance of very large plate-like chromatophores in the prothallium 

 of Osiminda cinnamonica (Campbell (12)) is a reversion to a 

 primitive condition retained in the Anthocerotes, it is. of course, 

 impossible to say, but it is not inconceivable, especially as the 

 same thing is found again normally in the sporophyte of Scl- 

 agincUa. The regular doubling of the chromatophores in the 

 sporophyte of Anthoceros also suggests that the multiple chro- 

 matophores of most Archegoniates are secondary. 



In the Anthocerotes the origin of the archesporium is differ- 

 ent from that of the other Hepatic?e, being hypodermal, as in 

 the lower Pteridophytes. The columella is in position similar 

 to the primary vascular bundles in the embryo of the Pterido- 



