Ordee TUBINARES. 

 the tube-nosed swimmers. 



Char. Swimming birds with tubular nostrils, the horny covering of the bill 

 consisting of several distmct pieces, separated by more or less marked grooves. 

 Terminal portion of maxilla produced into a strongly hooked unguis. Feet fully 

 webbed, anteriorly. Hallux rudimentary, consisting of an elevated sessile, often 

 minute, claw, sometimes wholly absent. Wings usually very long. Basipterygoids 

 usually absent ? Egg single, white. 



The number of families into Avliich the Order Tubinares is properly divisible is an 

 unsettled question. In a "Report on the Anatomy of the Petrels (Tubinares),'^ 

 which fonns the leading article of Vol. IV. of the Zoological Reports of H.M.S. 

 " Challenger," the late Professor W. A. Forbes divides the Tubinares into two fami- 

 lies as follows : (1) Procellariida', including as sub-families Procellari'mcv and Diome- 

 dehuc ; and (2) Oceanitida', composed of the genera Fregetta, Pelagodroma, Oceanites, 

 and Garrodia. According to this arrangement, the Albatrosses are held to be much 

 more nearly related to the genera Procellaria, Cyynochorea, and Ilidoctj plena than are 

 Oceanites and the other Oceanitldce^ — a proposition which, notwithstanding the 

 reasons advanced,^ we are not prepared to accept. 



The arrangement we have to propose is not supposed to be a perfectly natural one, 

 but there can be no question as to the naturalness of the groups defined below : — 



1. Diomedeidce. Wings very long and narrow, on account of the extreme development of 



the humerus and ulna. Reniiges 39-50 (the largest number in any known l)ird). Nasal 

 tubes lateral, widely and completely separated by the intervening " culminicorn." No 

 hind toe. Size very large. 



2. Procellariidae. Wings lengthened, but of different structure from the preceding (remiges 



2()-;30, usually about 30). Nasal tubes near together, laid side by side upon the cul- 

 men, the nostrils opening anteriorly. Hind toe present, though sometimes minute. Size 

 extremely variable. 



1 "... In spit(! of thcgcner.il superficial resemblance of the Occanitidcc to tlie smaller forms oi Proccl- 

 lariidcc, with which all ornithologists previous to Garrod had confounded them, the differences between the 

 two families are, it will be seen, numerous and important. The special ])oints of resemblance which the 

 OceanUidce have with such Procellarian genera as ProccllarUi and Cijinochorca — such as the general small 

 size, style of coloration, form of skull, comparative simplicity of the tensor patrirjii arrangement, simple 

 sterimm and syrinx (the last three peculiarities being also common to Pclccanoides) — may best bo 

 explained by supposing that these small Procellarian forms are on the wliole less specialized than the 

 larger ones (Fulmars, Albatrosses, Shearwaters, etc.), and so retain more of the characters possessed by 

 the primitive and now extinct connnon form from which both the Prucellariidcc and OceanUidce must 

 have been derived" (Forces, t. c. p. 56). 



2 " Accoi'ding to modern ideas, the object of a classification is not so much to represent morpliological 

 facts as to indicate the pliylogeuetie relations of tlie dilferent forms concerned" (FouEEs, t. c. p. 58). 



