18 



THE ANNELIDA POLYCHAETA. 



Brada irenaia, sp. nov. 



Ilyphagus bythincola, gen. et sp. nov. 



Maldanella fibrillata, sp. nov. 



Maldanidanim, gen. et sp.? 

 Nicolea profundi, sp. nov. 



c. 2000 fms. and below. 



Eiinoe eura, sp. nov. 

 Laetmonice wy\'illei Mcintosh 

 Onuphis pachytmema, sp. nov. 



socia, sp. nov. 

 Leptoecia abyssorum, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Cenogenus descendens, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Kesun fusus, gen. et sp. nov. 



Travisia profundi, sp. nov. 

 Ilyphagus phito, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Sonatsa meridionahs, gen. et sp. nov. 

 TerebelHdes eurystethus, sp. nov. 

 Moyanus explorans, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Pabits deroderus, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Paiwa abyssi, gen. et sp. nov. 



Pelagic Zone. 



Amphinome vagans (SavignjO (on drift) 

 Plotolepis nans, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Podarmus ploa, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Harmopsides natans, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Polynoe innatans, sp. nov. 

 Phyllodoce sp. c. 

 Lopadorrhynchus parvum, sp. nov. 



nans, sp. nov. 

 Mastigethus errans, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Pelagobia viguieri Gravier 

 Nans simplex, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Alciopa cantrainii (Delle Chiaji) 

 Torea pelagica, sp. nov. 

 Vanadis formosa Claparede. 

 Mauita nans, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Halodora reynaudii (Audouin and Milne 



Edwards) 

 Corynocephalus paumotanus, sp. nov. 

 Plotohelmis alata, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Rhynchonerella cincinnata (Greeff) 



pycnocera, sp. nov. 



parva, sp. nov. 



Typhloscolex miilleri Busch 

 Sagitella kowalewskii N. Wagner 



sp. a. 

 Plotobia simplex, gen. et sp. nov. 

 coniceps, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Tomopteris innatans, sp. nov. 

 eura, sp. nov. 

 idiura, sp. nov. 

 sp. a. 

 sp. b. 

 Autolytus obliquatus, sp. nov. 

 planipalpus, sp. nov. 

 torquens, sp. nov. 

 Syllis remex, sp. nov. 

 Odontosyllis atypica, sp. nov. 

 Kainonereis alata, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Nereis leucua, sp. nov. 



caenocirrus, sp. nov. 

 Platynereis polyscalma, sp. nov. 

 Telake epipolasis, gen. et sp. nov. 

 Glycera fundieola, sp. nov. 



CLASSIFICATION. 



The various efforts to divide the Polychaeta as a whole into major 

 groups have not proved satisfactory and many difficulties remain to be sur- 

 mounted before the broader affinities of the famiUes can be elucidated. It 

 seems best at present to follow the method used by Malmgren and various 

 recent writers in considering the families separately and arranging them in an 

 order bringing the more obviously related groups into general proximity. While 



