PLATE X. 



Fig. 1. E. cavatica, female, X 2. See Plate XI. (Page 185.) 



Fig. 2. E. cavatica, male, X2. 



Fig. 3. E. angulata (bicentennaria), X 1. See Plate XI. (Page 186.) 



Fig. 4. E. angulata (bicentennaria), X4, young specimen. 



Fig. 5. E. angulata (bicentennaria), immature male. 



Fig. 6. E. gemma, x 1. See Plates IX., XI. (Page 182.) 



Fig. 7. E. reticulata,^ female, x 2, new species. See Plate XI., Fig. 7. 



Fig. 8. E. recticulata, male, X2. See Plate XI., Fig. 8. 



Fig. 0. E. silvatica, female, X1.5. See Plate XI. (Page 188) 



Fig. 10. E. diademata, female, X]. See Plate XI. (Page 188.) 



Fig. 11. E. gemma, female, x 1.5. (Page 182.) 



> When writing the descriptive text of this species I classified it with E. miniata (page 177), which 

 it closely resembles, having at that time concluded that I was wrong in treating it as a new species. Sub- 

 sequent study led me to think the specimen different from E. miniata, and I therefore retain my original 

 name of the species in the plates, although too late to make proper correction and description in the text 

 itself. 



(326) 



