EICHARDS. — SIGNIFICANCE OP CHANGING ATOMIC VOLUME. 583 



show that the more closely the data are scrutinized, the more emphatic 

 is their support of the somewhat revolutionary hypothesis of atomic com- 

 pressibility. The fact that this should be the case is in itself a strong 

 support of the hypothesis; for fallacious arguments lose weight on closer 

 scrutiny instead of gaining weight. 



As has been already pointed out, the chief omission in all other work 

 on the subject of changing atomic volume * has been the lack of atten- 

 tion to the compressibilities of the substances concerned. If the pressure 

 of affinity causes a compression of the atomic volume, it is clear that a 

 given affinity will produce a greater change of volume when the atomic 

 volume is easily compressible than when it is only slightly compressible. 

 This matter will be considered at greater length in this paper than has 

 ever been possible before, since a number of appropriate compressibilities 

 have just been determined in this laboratory for the first time, as well as 

 several especially important specific gravities. 



Another question, which must also receive consideration, is the varying 

 intensity and nature of the affinities causing combination and cohesion. 

 Do both of the two affinities, the chemical and cohesive, which together 

 determine the stability of solids and liquids, exert internal pressure ; and 

 what effect does each of these have upon the volumes of substance? 



These questions are so closely related that they may best be discussed 

 in a single thesis. Indeed, owing to the complexity of the subject and 

 the scarcity of exact data, the verdict of each answer is needed to sustain 

 that of the other. 



In the first place, the question of compressibility may be taken up. 

 _ > 



* It is a pleasure to call attention here to the entirely independent work of J. 

 Trauhe in this direction. By an interesting coincidence he published in Drude's 

 Annalen, 5, 550 (June 20, 1901), the following statement : " Das Atomvolumen eines 

 Elementes iindert sich vielmehr von Stoff zu Stoff ; es ist um so kleiner, je grosser 

 die Anzieliung zu den benachbarten Atomen ist," while on June 15 of the 

 same year there appeared in the Proceedings of the American Academy, 37, 17,niy 

 version of the same relationship : " The atomic volume is not constant, but a /unction 

 of pressure and temperature and probably of electric stress." By pressure was meant 

 the internal pressure caused by affinity. In his pamphlet, " Ubcr den Raum der 

 Atome" [Ahrens's Sammlung. chem. und chern.-techn. Vortage IV. 256 (Stutt- 

 gart, 1890)] Traube anticipated several points contained in his paper of 1901, 

 and in my work in the same year, but this pamphlet was wholly unknown to nie 

 at the time. The fabric of Traube'a reasoning is complicated by his hypothetical 

 assumptions of "Covolumen" and " Kernvolumen," "gebundener" and "freier 

 Aether;"' but nevertheless lie deserves the credit of having appreciated the 

 importance of many of the facts. The question of priority is of little consequence, 

 especially since Miiller-Erzbach (1881) had priority over both. 



