Index 



showing, 41, conclusions, 41-42, 

 51—52; comparative water con- 

 tent of different kinds of fruit, 

 42—47, 49, experiments proving, 

 42— 47, 49, illustrations of, 45, 46, 

 opp. 54; water transport studies, 

 47-52, method used, 47, descrip- 

 tion of experiments, 47-48, con- 

 clusions, 48-51. 



Clay adobe soil, experiments on, 131. 



Climate, in its effect on abscission 

 (June drop) in Navel oranges, 

 307—319, 331; basis for soil clas>i 

 fication, 373. 



Cochin China, 283. 



Colby, G. E., cited, 103. 



Coleus blumei, 323. 



Colin, H., and de Eufz, J., cited, 140. 



Colletotrichum gleosporiodes, 297. 



Colorado, 303. 



Coit, J. E., 38, 283; acknowledgment 

 to, 53. 



Colloids, absorption by, 272. 



Colorimeter, error due to, 254. 



Conner, S. D., cited, 157. 



Copper chloride, 150, 151, 158, 180, 

 181, 198-203. 



Copper hydroxide, 154. 



Copper salts, 144, 150-152, 154, 155, 

 164, 165. 



Copper sulphate, 138, 151, 152, 158, 

 159, 204-209. 



Cornichon grapes, 119, 123. 



Cover crop, 230. 



Cruess, W. V., acknowledgment, 65, 

 66, 79; cited, 103. 



Cucurbita pepo, 138. 



Culberson, J. D., acknowledgment, 31. 



Davi, H., 103. 



Davis, California, weather conditions, 

 6; character of soil, 7; University 

 Farm at, 140, 244. 



de Candolle, A., cited, 283. 



de Heen, P., Gies and Micheels, H., 

 cited, 156. 



Dendrometer, A New, 55; disadvan- 

 tages of other volume tables, 55- 

 56; qualities needed in, 56; de- 

 scription of, 57; figure illustrat- 

 ing principle of, 57; method of 

 use, 57; advantages and disad- 

 vantages, 57-58; adjustment, 59; 

 error in, 59-60; figure showing 

 construction, 59, showing the in- 

 strument, 60; weight, (50; range, 

 and accuracy, 58, 61; field test of 

 sight lines, 61 ; modification for 

 timber surveying, 61. 



de Eufz, J., and Colin, H., cited, 140. 



Diablo soil type, study of, 378, 498. 



Die-back, 37.* 



Dixon, II. H., cited, 50, 52. 



Does CaCO.. or CaS0 4 Treatment 

 Affect trie Solubility of the Soil's 

 Constituents?, 271. 



Doulit, Sarah S., cited, 295, 



Dye stuff solutions, experiments with, 

 cm citrus, 47. 



Dysdercus suturellus, 292 note 18. 



Edison Land and Water Company, 

 2s."), acknowledgment, 53; Navel 

 orange orchard, 2S5, picture of, 

 opp. 334. 



Egypt, 292. 



Kle.-trolvtes, 139. 



Elliott, J. A., cited, 300. 



Emperor crops, figure showing, 119. 



England, 470. 



Environment, influence of, 38, 283, 

 284, 307-321, 329. 



Eucalyptus rudis, 51. 

 tereticornis, 51. 



Ferric chloride, 149, 150, 157, 158, 

 164, 192-197, 200, 201, 208-211, 

 214-217. 



Ferric phosphate, 151, 154. 



Ferric sulphate, 152, 153, 154, 155, 

 158, 159. 



Fertilization, relation to fruit develop- 

 ment. 293. 



Florida, 283, 297. 



Forage, furnished by Phalaris stenop- 

 tera, 7. 



Forbes, R. II., cited, 150, 165. 



Fortier, S., cited, 286. 



Fouquieria splendens, 40. 



Fowler, L. W., 25. 



Free, E. E., cited, 323. 



Free acid, changes in, 125, 129. 



Fruit production, effect of soil mois- 

 ture content on, 29. 



Fundulus, 69, 73. 



Fungi, as cause of abscission, 297-306, 

 332. 



Fungi Imperfecti, 300. 



Fungicides and t he June drops, 331. 



Fusaria, 303. 



Gas factor, as cause of abscission, 

 294-297. 



( ;n anium pyrenaicum, 29 1 . 



Gericke, W. P., 271 ; cited. 150. 



Gies, Micheels ami de Heen, cited, 156. 



Gile, P. L., cited, 162. 



Gile, P. L., and Ageton, C. X., cited, 

 L40. 



Gimingham, < '. T., cited. 272. 



Goodspeed, T. II., cited. 329. 



Gossypium herbaceum, 39. 



Grammarus, 69, 73. 



Grape juice, 66. 



Grapes, Changes in the Chemical Com- 

 position of, during Ripening, 

 L03; list of, 104; samples used in 

 Lnvesl igat ions, 105; method, 105; 



[501] 



