480 University of California Fuhlications in Botany [Vol. 5 



/. Sessilifolia derivatives 



Type 11 (cf. pi. 73) in F, gave 25 plants in 12F3H,P,iPn, all 

 vigorous except one, but that one showed the same characters of leaf 

 and flower as the others. All 25 plants possessed a sessilipollv type 

 of leaf very close to the Fo parent and uniform among themselves. 

 There were two distinct shades of color of the flowers, 9 red and 16 

 pink. No further generations of this line were grown. 



Type 14 (cf. pi. 76), so far as F, is concerned, was one of those 

 having sessile leaves of a broadly lanceolate type and pink flowers. 

 There were 25 plants in I2F3H0P3P3S, 24 had sessilifolia leaves of 

 type 14, while one (a "filler") had auriculata leaves like type 8; 19 

 had pink (or light pink) flowers, while 6 had red flowers. This line 

 was not followed through subsequent generations. 



Type 15 (cf. pi. 77) was represented in F,, 12¥ JIJ' ^Y ^^, by 25 

 vigorous plants which seemed surprisingly uniform and approached 

 macrophylla very closely as to leaf and color of the flower. In the 

 flower, however, the color seemed even darker than that of macrophylla, 

 there were only slight traces of the white triangular markings on the 

 limb, the limb was much more deeply lobed, and the tube less stout 

 and with the infundibulum much less abruptly swollen. These differ- 

 ences seem to indicate that type 15, which all the F3 plants closely 

 resemble, is not an exact recombination representing macrophylla. 



Type 15 was represented in 1913 by two families, F, of 10 plants 

 and F4 of 100 plants. Both families were uniform as to individuals, 

 and agreed with the F, population grown in 1912 as well as with the 

 F2 ancestor of the season of 1911. As this line seemed to be constant 

 and very close to, although not absolutely identical with, macrophylla, 

 differing in flower shape and leaf shape to some extent, type 15 was 

 considered to be a fixation and no further cultivation of it was made. 



Type 16 (cf. pi. 78), which in F. approached macrophylla very 

 closely in leaf, flower shape, and flower color, was represented in F3, 

 I2F3H0P3P8, by 25 plants. These were all alike and closely resembled 

 the F2 parent in all respects except in leaf shape. Fifteen had sessili- 

 folia leaves of type 16 while 8 had auriculata leaves approaching 

 those of type 10 (cf. pi. 72). This line was not grown in further 

 generations. 



Type 18 is the designation given to an F^ plant, of which no draw- 

 ing was made. It seemed close to macrophylla, but the flower color 



