1060 Excluded Species 



339. RUBUS allegheniensis X argutus. This hybrid was reported by 

 me in Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 1915: 136. 1916. It was based upon my no. 

 15883 which Bailey refers to Rubus argutus Link. 



340. Rubus allegheniensis X recurvans. This hybrid was reported 

 by me in Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 1916: 320. 1917. My Allen County speci- 

 men no. 19871, Bailey refers to Rubus abortus Bailey. My other specimens, 

 no. 20235 from De Kalb County, no. 19948 from Elkhart County, no. 

 21283 from Franklin County, and no. 20088 from Lake County, Bailey 

 refers to Rubus allegheniensis Porter. 



341. Rubus Alumnus Bailey. The reports of this species in Deam's 

 "Shrubs of Indiana," ed. 2, p. 117. 1924, from Knox and La Porte Counties 

 are now referred to Rubus impos Bailey. 



342. Rubus argutus X invisus. I reported this hybrid in Proc. In- 

 diana Acad. Sci. 1915: 136. 1916. It was based upon my no. 10825 which 

 Bailey refers to Rubus allegheniensis. 



343. Rubus argutus X procumbens. This hybrid was reported by me 

 in Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 1915 : 136. 1916. It was based upon my no. 

 9210 from Decatur County which Bailey now refers to Rubus frondosus. 



344. Rubus argutus X recurvans. This hybrid was reported by me in 

 Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 1916: 320. 1917. The Porter County record was 

 based upon my no. 20032 which is now referred to Rubus abactus Bailey. 

 The Wayne County record was based upon my no. 20249 and is now re- 

 ferred to Rubus ostryifolius Rydb. 



345. Rubus Andrewsianus Blanchard. Reported from St. Joseph 

 County by Nieuwland in Amer. Midland Nat. 4:70. 1915. Bailey is now 

 referring this species to Rubus ostryifolius Rydb. 



346. Rubus Baileyanus Britt. I reported this species in Proc. Indiana 

 Acad. Sci. 1916: 319. 1917 from Allen, Bartholomew, Clark, Crawford, Elk- 

 hart, Harrison, Lagrange, Marshall, Starke, and Steuben Counties. These 

 are now referred to Rubus flagellaris. It was reported by McDonald from 

 St. Joseph County in Amer. Midland Nat. 15:223. 1934. I think all of our 

 reports for this species should now be referred to Rubus flagellaris because 

 Bailey says : "The name has been applied generally in the North to forms 

 of R. flagellaris." Bailey (Gentes Herbarum 2:325. 1932) now regards 

 this species as belonging to the area to the southeast of us. 



347. Rubus Baileyanus X Enslenii. This hybrid was reported by me 

 in Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 1918: 147. 1919. It was based upon my no. 

 22894 from Vanderburgh County which is now referred to Rubus 

 flagellaris. 



348. Rubus betulifolius Small. I reported this species in Proc. In- 

 diana Acad. Sci. 1916:319. 1917. My Pike County record was based upon 

 my no. 16967, and the Posey County record was based upon my no. 16850, 

 both of which are now referred to Rubus argutus. 



