354 



A MANUAL OF THE ASPERGILLI 



A. quininae Heim., in Bui. Soc. 

 My c. France 9: 239. 1894. The 

 culture was found upon quinine 

 solution but the description 

 given will not separate it from 

 A. fumigatus. 



A. racemosus Persoon, in Neues 

 Mag. Bot. 1: 121. 1794. Also 

 in Tentamen Disp. Meth. Fung, 

 p. 41. 1797. Not recognizable. 



A. ramosus Hallier, in Ztschr. f. 

 Parasit. 2: 266-269, PI. 6, figs. 

 1-6. 1870. The figures and 

 descriptions evidently represent 

 a strain of A. fumigatus 151 



A. raulini, nomen nudum, in 

 Biourge's table, probably at- 

 tached to a culture in his collec- 

 tion. 



A. rehmii Zukal, in Oesterr. Bot. 

 Zeitschr. 43: 160, PI. II, figs. 

 1-10. 1893. Zukal regarded 

 this form as close to S. sulphurea 

 Fresenius, but his description of 

 perithecia and ascospores ex- 

 cludes the A. ochraceus group. 

 Blochwitz evidently believed 

 that Zukal had a mixed culture; 

 hence, the name would be unten- 

 able. Cultures belonging to the 

 A. ochraceus group have been 

 distributed under the name but 

 without proving their authority 281 



A. repandus Bainier and Sartory, in 

 Bui. Soc. Myc. France 27: 463, 

 Pi. XVIII. 1911. A. glaucus 



group. 



133 



A. repens (Cda.) DeBary, in Ab- 



handl. I. Senkenberg. Naturf. 



Gesellsch. 7: 379. 1870 103 



A. repens DeBary and Woronin, in 



Beitrage zur Morphologie und 



Physiologie der Pilzen p. 379. 



1866. 

 Syn. A. glaucus var. repens Corda, 



in Icones 5: 53, Taf. II, fig. 24. 



1842 103 



E. repens var. amstelodami Vuill., 



Soc. Mycol. de France, Bui. 



Trimest.36:131. 1920 122 



A. restrictus G. Smith, in Jour. 

 Text. Inst. 22: T. 115, fig. 5. 



1931 141 



A. restrictus var. B., G. Smith, in 

 Jour. Text Inst. 22: T. 115, figs. 

 4, 6, and 8. 1931. See A. 

 restrictus series in A. glaucus 



group 141 



A. roseus Batsch, in Elenchus Fung- 

 orum, p. 183, No. 58, fig. 58. 

 . 1783. Cited by Link, Spec. PL, 

 ed. IV, t. VI, pt. 1, p. 68. 1824. 

 Also by various authors for a 

 rosy or flesh-colored organism, 

 and by Corda as Haplotrichum 

 roseutn in Pracht-flora, PI. XI. 

 A. roseus Link, in Sp. Plant, ed. IV, 

 t. 6, part 1, p. 68. 1824. Link 

 took the name "roseus" used 

 descriptively, but not nomen- 

 clatorially, by Batsch (El. Fung, 

 p. 183, no. 58, fig. 58. 1783) for 

 a mold presumed to have been 

 an Aspergillus, by later authors. 

 The name appears as No. 2724 in 

 the Curtis Collection (1849) for a 

 member of the A. candidus 

 group. Neither descriptions 

 nor specimen dating back to 

 these authors fix this name for 

 any definite series. 

 A. rubens Green, in Boston Soc. of 

 Med. Sc. 1868. Not identifi- 

 able. 



A. ruber (Bremer) 114 



Syn. A. ruber (Spieckermann and 

 Bremer) Thorn and Church, in 



The Aspergillill2. 1926 114 



Syn. Eurotiurn rubrum Bremer, in 

 Zeitschr. f. Untersuch. d. Nah- 

 rung. und Genussmittel IV. 1901, 

 p. 72; also in Die fettverzehr. 

 Organismen in Nahr. u. Futter- 

 mitteln, " Dissert. Munster. 



1902 114 



Syn. E. rubrum Spieckermann and 

 Bremer, in Landw. Jahrb. 31: 



81-128. 1902 114 



A. ruber Estienne 



Syn. Physomyces heterosporus 

 Harz. 



