696 GUIDE TO THE LITERATUEE FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF FUNGI 



Chenantais, J. S.: Etudes sur les Pyrenomvcetes, Bull. soc. mijcol. France, 

 34:47-73. 123-236. Figs. 1-7. 1918; 35:46-98. 113-139. Pis. 1-6. Figs. 8-25. 

 1919. (Takes up many of the fundamental bases for our present classification 

 of this group and shows the errors. Discusses in particular the genera Nitsch- 

 kea, Lophiotrema, Rosellinia, Otthia, Massarinula, Lasiosordaria, Podo- 

 spora, and various species of other genera.) 



Cotton, A. D.: Notes on marine Pyrenomycetes, Brit. Mtjcol. Soc. Trans., 

 3:92-99. 1907. 



Sutherland, George K.: New marine Pyrenomycetes, Brit. Mycol. Soc. Trans., 

 5(1):147-155. PL 3. 1915. 



: Additional notes on marine Pyrenomycetes, ibid., 5(2) :257-263. PL 5. 



1917. 



: New marine fungi on Pelvetia, New Phytologist, 14:33-43. ^ figs. 1915. 



: Additional notes on marine Pyrenomycetes, ibid., 14:183-193. 5 figs. 



1915. 

 Barghoorn, E. S., and D. H. Linder: Marine fungi: their taxonomy and biology, 



Farlowia, l(3):395-467. Pis. 1-7. Figs. 1-2. 1944. 

 Seaver, Fred J.: Fimetariales, North American Flora, 3:57-88. 1910. (Includes 



Families Chaetomiaceae, by H. L. Palliser and Fimetariaceae (Sordariaceae) 



by F. J. Seaver.) 

 Griffiths, David: The North American Sordariaceae, Mern. Torreij Botan. Club, 



11:1-134. Pis. 1-19. Figs. 1-6. 1901. 

 Stratton, Robert: The Ascomycetes of Ohio: III. The Fimetariales of Ohio, 



Ohio Biological Survey, 3:75-144. Pis. 1-18. 1921. 

 Cain, Roy F.: Studies of coprophilous Sphaeriales in Ontario, Univ. Toronto 



Studies, Biol. Ser., 38:1-126. Figs. 1-96. 1934. 

 , and J. W Groves: Notes on seed-borne fungi: VI. Sordaria, Ca7i. J. 



Research, C,2Q{5) A8Q^ 495. Figs. 1-27.19^8. 

 Bayer, August: Monogratickd studia stredoevropskych druhii celedi. Sordari- 

 aceae. (A monograph of the central European species of the family Sorda- 

 riaceae), Acta Societatis Scientiarum Naturalium Moravicae Brno, 1(4):1-185. 



Qfigs. 1894. (With French resum^.) 

 Bainier, G.: Monographie des Chaetomidium et des Chaetomium, Bull. soc. 



mycol. France, 25:191-237. Pis. 10-26. 1910. 

 Chivers, a. H. : a monograph of the genera Chaetomium and Ascotricha, Meyn. 



Torrey Botan. Club, 14:155-240. Pis. 6-17. 1915. 

 Greathouse, Glenn A., and L. M. Ames: Fabric deterioration by thirteen 



described and three new species of Chaetomium, Mycologia, 37(1):138-155. 



Figs. 1-7. 1945. 

 Ames, L. M. : New cellulose destroying fungi isolated from military material and 



equipment, Mycologia, 41(6):637-648. /'\>s. 1-42. 1949. (Descriptions of nine 



new species of Chaetomium.) 

 Skolko, a. J., AND J. W. Groves: Notes on seed-borne fungi: V. Chaetomium 



species with dichotomously branched hairs. Can. J. Research, C, 26(3) :209- 



280. Pis. 1-7. 1948. 

 Benjamin, R. K. : Two species representing a new genus of the Chaetomiaceae, 



Mycologia, 41(3) :346-354. Figs. 1-33. 1949. (The new gonus Lophotrichus.) 

 Jaczewski, Arthur Louis: Les Chaetomi^es de la Suisse, Bidl. VHerbier Boissier, 



3:494-496. 1895. 



: Monographie des Cucurbitariees de la Suisse, Bull. soc. Vaudoise des 



Sciences Naturelles, Lausanne, 31:67-128. 2A figs. 1895. 



