Commissioner of Agriculture. 203 



'Label Nos. 10059, 10060.— Referred to J. T. Rogers. Pending. 

 Label No. 10080.— Referred to J. T. Rogers. Pending. 

 Label No. 9424.— Referred to J. T. Rogers. Pending. 

 Label Nos. 10081, 10082.— Referred to J. T. Rogers. Pending. 



The following are milk cases made prior to September 30, 

 1901, in which the Attorney-General has not yet designated 

 attorneys : 



Label Nos. 8565, 9404, 9406, 10094, 10096, 10106. 



MILK PRESERVATIVE. 



The following is a case for violation of the Agricultural Law 

 by selling milk preservative: 



Label No. 4. — Referred to J. T. Rogers. Pending. 



VINEGAR. 



Label No. 975.— Supreme Court, June 23, 1899, and at a session of the Court held In 

 December, 1900, Judge Andrews presiding, the action was dismissed because of techni- 

 calities resulting from an amendment to the law, which went into effect 19 days after 

 sample in the case was taken. 



Label Nos. 972, 989, 991.— Case affected by the same legal technicalities as preceding 

 case, and discontinued in December, 1900. 



Label No. 3211.— Referred to Risley & Love. Pending. 



Label No. 3202.— Referred to Risley & Love. Pending. 



Label No. 3205.— Referred to Risley & Love. Pending. 



Label No. 3204.— Referred to Risley & Love. Pending. 



The following are vinegar cases made prior to September 30, 

 1901, in which attorneys have not yet been designated by the 

 Attorney-General : 



Label Nos. 1154, 1155. 



VEAL. 



Some of these cases were made before the scheme was devised 

 'Of designating veals by tag numbers. I am therefore obliged to 

 .report some of the cases by the name of the defendant. 



People v. Zenas Jackson.— Supreme Court. Recovery $50. 



People v. E. J. Albro.— Referred to Frederick Hatch June 4, 1900, and attorney in- 

 structed by Attorney -General to suspend proceedings until further notice from him 

 pending further investigation. 



People v. E. Hopkins. — Supreme Court. Pending. 



People v. H. Page.— Supreme Court. Recovery $150 penalty and $216 costs. 



People v. David Bryant.— Supreme Court. Discontinued by advice of Attorney-Gen- 

 eral upon question of doubt as to defendant being personally guilty. 



People v. William Hook. — Supreme Court. Pending. 



People v. Henry Martin.— Referred to R. E. Steele. Recovery $40. 



People v. G. Heffron. — Supreme Court. Attorney directed by Attorney-General to sus- 

 pend proceedings until further notice from him, pending investigation as to guilt of 

 defendant. 



