42 Kepoet or the Chemist of the 



Knmbfer 

 3rjUCE= AJI» Al»T>BEaBra OF MjiyrFACT L'KEKS. of bratdg 



rf-fiortM. 



George F. Tuthill & Co., Greenport, N. Y 1 



J. E. Tj^ert & Co., 42 Sonth Delaware Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa 8 



Tygert-AUen Fertilizer Co., 2 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pa 9 



F. G. Underwood, Oneida, N, Y 3 



J. E, Van Benthuysen, Lishaakill, N, Y 4 



J. W, VanCott & Son, Unadilla, N. Y 8 



Walker Fertilizer Co., Clifton Springs, N. Y 16 



Walker, Stratman & Co., Pittsburg, Pa 8 



F. E. Webster, Sennett, X. Y 1 



Eobt. Weat, Hamilton, Ontario, Can 2 



W. E. Whann, William Penn, Pa 8 



M. E. Wheeler & Co., Rutland, Vt 10 



Wickwire & Sheldon, Hamilton, N. Y 4 



Wnioughby & Fletcher, Oxford, N. Y 2 



Wilkin.«on & Co., 29 South William Street, New York City 2 



Williams & Clark Fertilizer Co., 27 William Street, New York City. . , 25 



M. J. Wilson, Kushford, N. Y 1 



Wooster & Mott, Union Hill, N. Y 7 



C. K. Yates, Farmer, N. Y '. 1 



York Chemical Works, York, Pa 5 



Zell Guano Co., Baltimore, Md 45 



TERMS USED IN STATING RESULTS OF ANALYSIS. 



In the tabl^H followinj^, the tenns used to express the results 

 of analy.«is are self-explauator-y for the most part. Attention is 

 called, however, to two additional determinations which we have 

 not usually publiHh*;rd heretofore. 



One of these is " water-soluble " phosphoric acid. While 

 manufacturers are required to gaarantee only the amount of 

 available phosphoric acid fwater-soluble plus reverted or citrate- 

 HolubU'j, yet it seems desirable that consumers should know what 

 propor-t.ion of the available is water-soluble. The available phos- 

 phoric a^;id being equal, one would choose by preference a 

 fertilizer containing the larger amount of water-soluble phos- 

 phoric a/;id. 



