168 



EXPERIMENTAL FARMS 





32 

 33 

 34 



35 



36 

 37 

 38 

 39 

 40 

 41 



9-10 EDWARD VII., A. 1910 

 Feeding Stuffs, 1908 — Concluded. 



Name. 



Particulars. 



Cyphers — Daniel's egg 



mash 



Beat's milk albumen, 



No. 1... 



Bent's milk albumen, 



No. 2 



Feed No. I, from corn, 



rye and barley malt 



majjh 



Feed No. 2, from pure 



barley malt Tnash. . . . 

 Feed No. 3, from rye 



and rye malt mash . 

 Apple pomace from 



cannery 



Apple pomace from 



cider mill 



Apple pomace from 



cider mill 



Feed No. 2, Walkerville 



Distillery 



Jos. Tardif, St. Louis, Montreal. 

 R. A.A.Johnston, Ottawa, Ont. 



H. Walker & Sons, Walkerville, Ont. 



Spratt & Schou, Burnaby Lake, B.C. 

 Col. D.W- Stevenson, Berwick, N.S. 



S. Allen, Norwick, Ont 



T W . Raphael & Co. .Montreal, Que, 



o 



p.c. 



6 

 3 

 6 



85 

 8 

 5 



27 



5 73 



a 

 "Si 





O 



p.c. 



01: 21 



39; 41 



72 



19 



83 17 



14 

 1 

 3 

 5 



12 



D.C. 



78 





p.c. 



53 

 16 



52 



05; 49 



12 60-48 



7-71 

 69 38 

 66-20 

 61-63 



Si 



p.c. 

 8-92 



14-62 



20-40 



11-85 



4-73 



p.c. 



4-64 

 32-34 



2-31 



1-31 

 3 80 

 1-23 

 0.37 



14-61I 206 



18-38 

 10-50 



2 24 



5-22 



CORN PRODUCTS. 



In commenting, in last year's report, upon the various feeding stuffs resulting as by- 

 products from the manufacture of starch and glucose, it was pointed out that the term 

 'gluten meal' -was being wrongly used by certain manufacturers, the material being 

 put out under this name being really of the nature of gluten feed. This cannot be 

 considered as accidental or of no consequence, for gluten meal has long been recog- 

 nized as a feed of the most concentrated character, with practically 35 per cent of 

 protein, whereas gluten feed has been equally well known as a much inferior article 

 containing from 15 per cent to 20 per cent protein. According to our analysis — 

 and we have thoroughly investigated the matter — there is only one Canadian firm that 

 puts a genuine gluten meal on the market, though there are several materials sold 

 under this name which should be branded as gluten feed. It is only this mis-branding 

 that can be objected to — gluten feed is an excellent; food and one that can be advan- 

 tageously used to increase the protein-content of the ration. It is, however, surely 

 misleading to sell it under a name commonly understood to carry with it double the 

 amount of protein present. 



It "will be noticed that the Gluten Feed of the Brantford Starch Works and the 

 * Jersey Brand Gluten Meal ' (really a gluten feed) contain practically the same 

 amount of protein; the former, however, is the more valuable since it contains a much 

 larger proportion of oil or fat. 



The analysis of the corn meal (No. 4) shows it to be genuine and of good quality. 

 It was sent from a shipment that was supposed to be adulterated by admixture with 

 ground corn cob. 



WHEAT PRODUCTS. 



Five samples of bran were examined. No. 5 is somewhat low in protein and fat, 

 though not sufficiently so as to warrant any suspicion of adulteration. Freedom from 

 the presence of any notable amount of oat hulls, sweepings, &c., is attested by the fact 

 that the percentages of fibre and ash are not excessive. 



