MORGAN HEBARD 
145 
Panchlora exoleta Burmeister 
1838. F[anchIora] exoleta Burmeister, Handb. Ent., ii, abth. ii, pt. i, p. 
507. [Para and Bahia, Brazil.] 
Mllavicencio, Intendencia del IMeta, (from A. ]\Iaria), 32 cf, 
19 9. 
We are uncertain as to whether the material, recorded from 
Bofiota as this sjiecies,'*’ was actually secured at that locality. 
Achroblatta luteola ( Blanchard) 
1843. Blatta luteola Blanchard, in d’Orbigny, Vo}’. Ainer. INlerid., \ i, pt. 2, 
]i. 215, 1)1. 26, fig. 3. [Santa Cruz, Bolivia.] 
\’illavicencio, Intendencia tlel Aleta, (from A. Alaria), 1 cf. 
This is a small specimen; length of body, 13; length of pro- 
notum, 4.2; width of pronotum, 5.2; length of tegmen, 15.1 mm. 
Combined with its form tlie light brown coloration of this 
insect, with latero-cephalic portions of pronotum and three 
marginal patchesof huffy on the tegmina,give it some reseml)lance 
to certain species of the Lampyridae (Coleoptei'a). 
Phortioeca apolinari new species (Plate X, figures 33 and 34.) 
This striking species is readily distinguished from the known 
members of Phortioeca by its smaller size, less strongly produced 
meso-cephalic cucullate portion of the pronotum, paler general 
coloration and striking color pattern. 
Type . — cf; \’illavicencio, Intendencia del Aleta, Colombia. 
Elevation, 1400 feet. September, 1918. (From A. Maria.) 
[Hebard Collection, Type no. 670.] 
Size smaller than the other known species of Phortioeca, form similar. 
Head flattened, rather small, ej'es separated by a distance slightly less than 
half that between the rather large ocellar spots. Pronotum extending well 
beyond head and cucullate in meso-cei)halic portion, this {)ortion defined 
from the elevated lateral and caudal portions by a distinct sulcus, the caudal 
portions briefly, broadly and flatly ridged longitudinally between the slightly 
more decided ridges at the humeral shoulders; surface jiolished, with well 
scattered rugae, particularly in the more elevated ])ortions, with iinju'essed 
punctae meso-caudad; cephalic, margin decidedly cingulate, showing an 
extremely weak emargination on each side, due to the moderate production 
of the meso-cephalic portion, which is not as decided as in the other species; 
latero-caudal angles rounded, not sharply angulate, at slightly over ninety 
degrees; caudal margin oblicpie and very broadly convex to the humeral 
angles, between these transverse with a minute and brief, but distinct, angu- 
late production mesad. 
Mem. Am. Ent. 8oc., no. 4, j). 107, (1920). The ju'esent series is dis- 
cussed and exoleta comjiared with cubensis on the preceding i)age. 
TR.\XS. AM. ENT. ,SOC., XLVII. 
