IGG 
COLOMBIAN' DERMAPTERA AND ORTHOPTERA 
with kildaro greon. \N'ings with anterior field snuff brown, weakly mottled 
with bister distad and in median section, irregularly and narrowly marked 
with kildare green toward the costal margin; radiate field transparent, 
weakly tinged with saccardo’s umber. Cephalic and caudal femora bister, 
median femora greenish buff, tibiae of all limbs deep olive buff. 
Length of body, (approximated) 53; length of pronotum, 2.3; width of 
pronotum, 1.4; length of mesonotum, 8.3; length of tegmen, 4.1; length of 
wing, 27.5; greatest witlth of wing, 14.4; length of cephalic femur, 11.7; 
length of cephalic tibia, 11; length of caudal femur, 10.3; length of caudal 
tibia, 9.7; length of caudal metatarsus, 2.8 mm. 
The type is unique. 
HETERONEMINAE 
Bacteria apolinari llebard 
1919. Bacteria apolinari Hebard, Trans. Am. Ent. Soc., xlv, p. 101, pi. 
XIX, figs. 10 and 11. [cf ; Susumuco, Cundinamarca, Colombia.] 
\'illavicencio, Intendencia del Meta, V, 1919, (from A. Maria), 
1 c^. 
The jR-esent, somewhat larger, specimen is in a much better 
state of preservation than the type, measuring as follows; length 
of body, 109: length of head, 4; length of pronotum, 3.2; length 
of mesonotum, 28.8; width of mesonotum, 1.8; length of metano- 
tuni, including median segment, 18; length of median segment, 
10.8; length of cephalic femur, 34.3; length of cejihalic tibia, 
38.8; length of median femur, 28.3; length of caudal femur, 35, 
length of caudal tibia, 39, length of caudal metatarsus, 7 mm. 
Libethra reservata Brumicr 
1907. Ocn[ophila\ resermla Binmncr, Iiisekteiifamilie der Phasmiden, 
II lief., p. 315. [c?: Bogota, [Colombia!.] 
llogota, (hmdinamarca, IX, 1918, (from A. Maria), 1 cf. 
There ai)])ears to be little (piestion but that the specimen at 
hand represents tlu' same s])ecies described liy Brunner as Oenu- 
phild re.servdta, though that author’s original description is wretch- 
edly inadeipiate. 
('omjiarison shows the present individual to differ only in the 
slightly short (‘r metanotiim, median segment and limbs, which 
differiuices may easily tie due to carelessness in measuring the type, 
as BruniK'r’s work on the genus is (wam more glaringly superficial 
and evidc'utly hurrii'd than (dsewlu're in that monograiih. In 
