i6o SCIENCE AND AESTHETIC JUDGMENT 



34 On Intelligence , II, 187. 



35 Ibid., 197-198. ' 



36 Ibid.i 205. 



37 /^z^., 216-217, and fF. 



38 Ibid.y 226. 



39 /iiW., 230, our italics. 

 40 /^iW., 231. 



41 /izW., 246. 



42 /Z»2W., 253. 



43 /3zW., 256, our italics. 



44 Ibid., 259. Cf. our Chapter X, p. 130. 

 45 /^^W., 261. 



46 /izW., 268. 



47 /Z>zW., 270-271. 



48 Ibid., 263. 



49 /Z>iW., 264. The Heisenberg principle would change the wording here to 

 'it is necessary that it should'. 



50 Ibid., 265. 



51 Ibid., 271. 



52 Ibid., 272. 



53 Ibid., 274, our italics. 



54 Ibid., 277. 



55 Ibid., 281, our italics. 



56 Ibid., 282, our italics. * 



57 Ibid., 283-286. 



58 Ibid., 286. 



59 Ibid., 288. 



60 Appendix C, 'Type Analysis in the Sciences'. 



61 The language here seems to imply a blending of efficient and formal 

 causes. Perhaps so: perhaps the distinction is fundamentally one made in time, 

 between the beginning and end of a unitary process. In any case, whatever 

 other elements of analysis are invoXvtd, forms function efficiently. 



62 See, for example, Cohen's chapter on 'Communal Ghosts in Political 

 Theory' [Reason and Nature, Book III, Chapter III). 



63 Ibid., p. 367. 



64 Ibid, p. 153. 



65 Ibid., p. 19. 



^^ Ibid., p. 161, our italics. 



67 From Axel Hdgerstrom, quoted in Schilpp, ed., The Philosophy of Ernst 

 Cassirer, pp. 208-209. 



68 Cassirer, Substance and Function, p. 232. 



69 Op. cit., p. 161, our italics. 



70 Ibid., p. 368, our italics. Nevertheless, a persistent function would seem 

 to point to a persistent 'something' — structure, or pattern of organization, or 

 constellation of powers, however you choose to label it. That we can never fully 

 understand the operations of this 'something' should not lead us to deny the 

 evidence for its existence; and convenient labels would still seem to be the 

 ancient ones of 'forms' and 'universals'; if these terms did not exist, we should 

 have to invent them, or their equivalents. 



