THE SOLICITOR. 



831 



Cases under section 10 of the food and drugs act of June SO, 1906, reported during the 

 fiscal year 1910 and finally determined during the year or pending in the courts at its 

 close — Continued. 



r.&D, 



case 

 No. 



Claimant. 



1160 



1163 

 1166 



1167 



1171 

 1177 



1178 



U85 



1188 

 1189 



1191 



1195 



1108 



1204 



1205 



1206 



1208 



1209 



J. Lindsay Wells 

 Co. 



Smith, Kline & 

 French Co. 



No claimant 



D. Rothschild 

 Grain Co. 



Herbert P. Pills- 

 bury. 



No claimant. 



Psakl Bros. 



George Spraul. 



Judicial district. 



Nature of the case. 



W arner- Jenkinson 

 Co. 



S o h o n , Stephen- 

 son & Co. 



Newport Mill Co., 



The Philadelphia 

 Horse and Cattle 

 Molasses Co. 



Newport Miil Co.. 



National Rakers 

 Egg Co. 



Hudson Manufac- 

 turing Co. 



Quaker Oats Co . . . 



No claimant. 



Tennessee, eastern 

 district. 



Pennsy I vania, 

 eastern district. 



Illinois, northern 

 district. 



Arkansas, eastern 

 district. 



Pennsy 1 vania, 

 eastern district. 



District of Colum- 

 bia. 



Pennsy 1 vania, 

 western district. 



Pennsy 1 vania, 

 eastern district. 



Ohio, southern dis- 

 trict. 



T e -x a s , southern 

 district. 



West\MrRinia, 

 southern dis- 

 trict. 



North Carolina, 

 western district. 



District of Colum- 

 bia. 



North Carolina, 

 western district. 



Pen n s y 1 V a n i a 

 eastern district. 



Louisiana, eastern 



district. 



.\rkansas, eastern 

 district. 



Maryland . 



500 sacks of iviulterated an I 

 niisbranded stock feed 

 shipped from Georgia to 

 'I'ennessee. 



5 boxes of a<Uilterated asafetida 

 shipped from New York to 

 I'ennsylvania. 



20 barrels of adulterated oys- 

 ters shipped from Connecti- 

 cut to Illinois. 



1 car of adulterated oats 

 shipped from Iowa to Ar- 

 kansas. 



5 barrels of adulterated olives 

 shipped from New York to 

 I'ennsylvania. 



GO bags of adulterated molasses 

 grains stock feed shippecl 

 from Virginia to the District 

 of Columbia. 



70 cases of adulterated eggs 

 shipped from New York to 

 Pennsylvania. 



10 barrels of adulterated olives 

 shipped from New York to 

 Pennsylvania. 



275 cases of adulterated tomato 



catsup shipped from Indiana 



to Ohio. 

 1 barrel of TTiisbranded vanilla 



extract shipped from M)> 



souri to Texas. 



Disposition or present 

 status of case. 



31 barrels of mlsbranded cider 

 shipped from Kentucky to 

 West Virginia. 



700 sacks of misbranded com 

 meal shipped from Tennes- 

 see to North Carolina. 



54 barrels of adulterated mo- 

 lasses shipped from Pennsyl- 

 vania to the District of Co- 

 lumbia. 



3 lots of misbranded com meal 

 sliippod from Tennessee to 

 North Carolina. ' 



1 barrel of adulterated desic- 

 cated egg sliipped from New 

 York to I'ennsylvania. 



2 barrels of adultj>rated and 

 misbranded vanilla extract 

 shipped from Illinois to 

 Louisiana. 



158 cases of niisbranded break- 

 fast food shipped from Illi- 

 nois to -Vrkansas. 



250 cases of adulterated sar- 

 dines shipped from Maine to 

 •Marvland. 



I 



Decree of condemna- 

 tion and forfeiture 

 rendered. (Notice of 

 Judgment No. 230.) 



Libel filed; seizure ef- 

 fected; pending. 



Order of default and 

 destruction entered. 

 (Notice of Judgment 

 No. 447.) 



Decree of condemna- 

 tion and forfeiture 

 rendered. (Notice of 

 Judgment No. 385.) 



Libel filed; seizure ef- 

 fected; pending. 



Plea of nolocontendere; 

 decree of condemna- 

 tion and forfeiture 

 rendered; order of 

 destruction. (Notice 

 of Judgment No. 256.) 



Decree of condemna- 

 nation and destruc- 

 tion rendered. (No- 

 tice of Judgment No. 

 293.) 



Judgment in favor of 

 United States. ( No- 

 tice of Judgment No. 

 649.) 



Verdict in favor of 

 claimant: (Jovom- 

 ment appeal pending. 



Libel filed; seizure ef- 

 fected; claimant'sex- 

 ceptions to libel over- 

 ruled; decree of con- 

 demnation and for- 

 f e i t u re rendered; 

 landing on writ of 

 error to circuit court 

 of appeals for fifth cir- 

 cuit, southern dis- 

 trict of Texas. 



Decree of condemna- 

 tion and forfeiture 

 entered. (Notice of 

 Judgment No. 015.) 



Decree of condemna- 

 tion and forfeiture 

 rendered. (Notice of 

 Judgment No. 3,'>S.) 



Decree of condemna- 

 tion and forfeiture 

 rendered. (Notice of 

 Judgment No. 254.) 



Decree of condemna- 

 tion and forfeiture 

 rendered. ( Not ice of 

 Judgment No. .3:>?*.) 



Decree of condeiiina- 

 tlon and destruction 

 rendered. (Notice 

 of Jutlgment No. 544.) 



Libel filed; seizure ef- 

 fected; pending. 



Decree of condemna- 

 tion and forfeiture: 

 claimant's appeal 

 pending. 



Decree of condemna- 

 tion and forfeit ure 

 rendered; order of 

 destruction. (Notice 

 of Judgment No. 282. 



