THE SOLICITOR. 



839 



Gates under the food and drugs act of June 30, 1906, reported for criminal prosecution 

 during the fiscal years 1908 and 1909, and finally determined during the fiscal year 1910 — 

 Continued. 



F.&D. 

 case 

 No. 



Defendant. 



Charles L. Heinle 

 Specialty Co. 



Mar s h a 1 1 1 o w n 

 Syrup and Su- 

 gar Cfo. 



Newton Tea and 

 Spice Co. 



Muscatine French 

 Cheese Co. 



O. L. Gregory 

 Vinegar Co. 



Dennis Rupert 

 Dupuis. 



Bertin & Lepori. . 



Wiseola Co. 



Athens Bottling 

 Worlts. 



Acme Mills Co 



F. H. Finley & 

 Son. 



JohnA. FalclcCo. 



The Dow & Snell 

 Co. 



H. F. Kaufman & 

 Co. 



Baker Preserving 

 Co. 



A. L. Pllsbury, jr 



Koca Nola Co. 



Stelnhardt Bros. 

 &Co. 



Mcllvaine Bros. 



Penn s y 1 v a n i a, 

 eastern district. 



Iowa, southern 

 district. 



Ohio, southern 

 district. 



Iowa, southern 

 district. 



Alabama, north- 

 ern district. 



Missouri, 

 district. 



eastern 



California, north- 

 em district. 



Alabama, north- 

 ern district. 



Georgia, northern 

 district. 



Oregon. 



District of Colum- 

 bia. 



New Jersey 



Ohio, northern 

 district. 



New Yorkj south- 

 ern district. 



Colorado. 



Louisiana, eastern 

 district. 



Georgia, northern 

 district. 



New Yorkj south 

 orn district. 



Pennsy 1 van la, 

 eastern district. 



Nature of offense charged. 



Shipment by vendees of de- 

 fendant guarantor of adul- 

 terated and iiiisbranded va- 

 nilla extract from Pennsyl- 

 vania to Delaware. 



Shipment of misbranded 

 sirup from Iowa to Colo- 

 rado. 



Shipment of adulterated and 

 misbranded pepper from 

 Ohio to Mississippi. 



Shipment of misbranded 

 cheese from Iowa to Illinois 



Shipment of adulterated and 

 misbranded vinegar from 

 Alabama to Georgia. 



Shipment of misbranded drug 

 (Radol) from Missouri to 

 District of Columbia. 



Shipment of adulterated and 

 misbranded olive oil from 

 California to New Mexico. 



Shipment of 

 sirup from 

 Louisiana. 



misbranded 

 Alabama to 



Shipment of misbranded cafe 

 coca from Georgia to Loui- 

 siana. 



Shipment of adulterated and 

 misbranded gluten flour 

 from Oregon to Washington. 



Offer for sale of adulterated 

 water in the District of Co- 

 lumbia. 



Shipment of misbranded 

 headache cure from New 

 Jersey to Pennsylvania. 



Shipment of adulterated and 

 misbranded spirits of cam- 

 phor from Ohio to Michigan. 



Shipment of adulterated and 

 misbranded drug (damiana) 

 fromNew York to Maryland. 



Shipment of adulterated and 

 misbranded sirup from 

 Colorado to NebrasKa. 



Shipment of misbranded coke 

 extract from Louisiana to 

 Tennessee. 



Shipment of adulterated and 

 misbranded Koca Nola from 

 Georgia to the District of 

 Columbia. 



Shipment of misbranded 

 damiana from New York to 

 Miissachusetts. 



Shipment of adulterated and 

 misbranded colocynlh from 

 Pennsylvania to Michigan. 



Disposition of the case. 



Defendant pleaded 

 guilty and fined $25 

 and costs. (Notice of 

 Judgment No. 389.) 



Consolidated with 353. 

 (Notice of Judgment 

 No. 4<i<J.) 



Defendant convicted; 

 motion for new trial 

 pending. 



Defendant pleaded 

 guilty and fined $10 

 and costs. ( Notice of 

 Judgment No. 431.) 



Defendant pleaded 

 guilty and fined $25 

 and costs. 



Defendant pleaded 

 guilty and fined $50 

 and costs. (Notice of 

 Judgment No. 184.) 



Defendant pleaded 

 guilty and fined $100. 

 (Notice of Judgment 

 No. 417.) 



Defendant pleaded 

 guilty and flneQ $25 

 and costs. (Notice of 

 Judgment No. 594.) 



Defendant fined S5 and 

 costs. (Notice of 

 Judgment No. 23.5.) 



Defendant pleaded 

 guilty and fined $25. 

 (Notice of Judgment 

 No. 250.) 



Defendant convicted 

 and fined .?10. (Notice 

 of Judgment No. 175.) 



Defendant pleaded 

 non vult and sentence 

 suspended. (Notice 

 of Judgment No.41S.) 



Defendant pleaded 

 nolo oontendere and 

 fined ^2r> and costs. 

 (Notice of Judgment 

 No. 550.) 



Defendant pleaded ■ 

 guilty to adultera- 

 tion; nol. pros, as to 

 misbranding; fined 

 $100. (Notice of 

 Judgment No. 245.) 



Defendant pleaded 

 guilty and fined $10 

 and costs. (Notice of 

 Judgment No. 209.) 



Defendant pleaded 

 guilty and fined $10 

 and costs. (Notice of 

 Judgment No. 2.30.) 



Defendant convicted 

 and fined $50. (Xoliee 

 of Judgment No. 202.) 



Defendant convicted 

 and fined S'2O0. (No- 

 tice of Judgment No. 

 .51)1.) 



Doffuulant pleaded 

 non vult contendere 

 and fined $10. (No- 

 tice of Judgment 

 No. 390.) 



