354 Dinner lo l'rofrssor Cliillriulrii [\\)r\\ 



Immedialcly aficr ilic conclusion of Professor C "liiUeiidcirs ad- 

 dress, ilie loaslniaster announcc'd iliat ilie National InsiiUite of Social 

 Sciences liad xoted a t^'old nicdal lo Professor Chillenden in reco^s^- 

 nition of tlie distinciion lic lias aitained in original investigation in 

 llic lield of plnsiological cbemistrv. Dr. H. Holljrook Curtis, sec- 

 rclar}- oi ilie Inslitnte. made the presentation. The faces of Ihe 

 niedal are shown on page 353-. 



Prof. Lafayette B. Mendel followed Dr. Cnrtis witli a presenta- 

 tion of engrossed congratulatory resolutions A\liich had Ijeen adopted 

 ])}• Professor Chittenden's associates in the Governing Board of the 

 Sheffield Scientific School. (See page 351. ) 



The accompanying group portrait \\as made jnst after seats 

 had been taken at the tables. The names of all in attendance, ar- 

 ranged in taljle groiips, are appended :^ 



Speakers' table 



Harvey Cushing Russell H. Chittenden William T. Sedgwick 

 H. H. Donaldson Frank S. Meara William T. Porter 



John A. Hart well Graham Lusk Elliott P. Joslin 



Table i. Lafayette B. Mendel, S. J. Meltzer, Jacques Loeb, 

 Yandell Henderson, Simon Flexner, P. A. Levene, Frederic S. Lee. 



Table 2. Henry Hun, William Browning, H. H. Curtis, 

 Henry Ling Taylor, W. M. Kenna, Harry Saltzstein, Frank C. 

 Gephart, H. G. Barbour. 



Table 3. John Rogers, Wm. L. Culbert, R. H. Wylie, William 

 Armstrong, Joseph A. Blake, W. L. Griswold, G. Wyckofif 

 Cummins. 



Table 4. Theodore C. Janeway, J. H. M. Knox, S. P. Good- 

 hart. Chas. H. Studio, George S. C. Badger, Joseph S. Wheelwright, 

 N. R. Norton, Joseph H. Pratt. 



Table 5. Charles Norris, A. N. Richards, E. K. Dunham, 

 John A. Mandel, H. D. Dakin, George B. Wallace, W^illiam J. Gies, 

 Holmes C. Jackson, William C. Lusk. 



^ The men at tables 1 1 and 12, when the photograph was taken, subsequently 

 reassembled at tables 9, 10 and 2. One or two additi(3nal rearrangements account 

 for the disagreement between the indications of the portrait and the table lists. 



