

ERRATUM. 



Pa#e 3, Une 2: Pleocnemia Bakeri, v. A. v. B. — Omit this 

 name, it should be Pleocnemia Trimeni, Bedd. — I committed the 

 mistake in conséquence of Beddome's drawing, which shows a 

 bipinnatifid frond and by Christensen's Index Filicum, which refer- 

 red this plant to Blume's Aspidium giganteum. — Lines 2—19 

 should be modified as follows : 



l'icocjiemia Trimeni. Mietftt.. Handb. Ind. Feras, 

 223, flg. N°. 114; Nephrodium giganteum, Bk., Hk. Bk., Syn. Fil., 

 503; Aspidium giganteum, Gopel. (not Bl.\ Polypod. Philipp., 38; 

 (BL, C. Chr., Ind. Fil., 75. p. p.). 



Judging from Beddome's and JBaker's descriptions this plant 

 does not agrée with Blume's Aspidium giganteum, which lias 

 the lower pinnae pinnatifid and not 2-pinnatirId at the base. A 

 form found in Sumatra by D r . Burck and determined as Pleocne- 

 mia gigantea, Pr. agrées with Beddome's diagnosis ; it has the 

 rhizome erect, densely clothed with rather long, linear-subulate, 

 fuscous scales, the stipes sparingly scaly like the main rachis, 

 the ultimate lobes oblong, blunt to acute, entire to broadly 

 toothed. — 



Sumatra; Geylon, Southern India, ? Philippines. 



j 



