46 Bulletin 81 



References {for fodder analyses). Table II. 



1. Jenkins and Winton, U. S. Dept. Agr., Of. Exp. Sta., Bui. 11 (1892). 



2. Woll, Handbook for Farmers and Dairymen, pp. 3-5 (1900). 



3. Lindsey and Crocker, Mass. Hatch. Sta. Rpt., 8, pp. 248-259 (1896). 



4. Allen, IT. S. Dept. Agr., Farmer's Bui. 22, pp. 24-32 (1895). 



5. Atwater and Benedict, Conn. (Storrs) Sta. Rpt. 11, pp. 229-242 

 (1898). 



6. Koenig. Zusam. u. Verdau. d. Futtermittal II, p. 1258. 



7. Tenn. Sta. Buls., (a) IV, 1 (1891), (b) IX, 3 (1896). 



8. Sundry Vt. Sta. publications more particularly, Bui. 78, Rpts. 6, 8, 

 9, 10 and 11, and unpublished analyses. 



9. Conn. (State) Sta. Rpt. 23, pp. 178-195 (1899). 



9.8 The analyses thus marked, with the exception of that of flax meal, 

 are calculated from analyses made within the past two and one-half years 

 by New England stations. In many cases these analyses were simply for 

 protein and fat. These figures have been used in conjunction with those of 

 complete analyses as given in 9 and sundry slight changes have been made 

 in the ash, fiber and nitrogen-free extract figures to correspond with the 

 corrected average protein and ether extract data. Thus for example the 

 cottonseed meal analysis as printed is derived from 10 complete analyses 

 and 249 incomplete ones as is shown in the left hand column. As a result 

 of the use of the latter the average figures for protein, nitrogen-free extract 

 and ether extract of the 10 change respectively as follows : 46.4 becomes 

 45.4, 22.5 becomes 22.7, and 10.4 becomes 11.2. 



