Sex as an Adaptation 427 



one that is more constructive is a female. Furthermore, 

 whichever process is in the excess during development deter- 

 mines the sex of the individual. Thus, if conditions are very 

 favorable, there will be more females produced ; but if, on the 

 other hand, there is an excess of the breaking-down process, 

 males are produced. So far, the process is conceived as a 

 purely physiological one, but to this the authors then apply 

 the selection hypothesis, which, they suppose, acts as a sort 

 x^jLPbf break or regulation of the physiological processes, or in 

 other words as a directive agent. They state : " Yet the 

 sexual dimorphism, in the main, and in detail, has an adaptive 

 significance, also securing the advantages of cross-fertiliza- 

 tion and the like, and is, therefore, to some extent the result 

 of the continual action of natural selection, though this may, 

 of course, check variation in one form as well as favor it in 

 another." Disregarding this last addition, with which Geddes 

 and Thompson think it necessary to burden their theory, let 

 us return to the physiological side of the hypothesis. Their 

 idea appears to me a sort of symbolism rather than a 

 scientific attempt to explain sex. If their view had a real 

 value, it ought to be possible to determine the sex of the 

 developing organism with precision by regulating the condi- 

 tions of its growth, and yet we cannot do this, nor do the 

 authors make any claim of being able to do so. The hy- 

 pothesis lacks the only support that can give it scientific 

 standing, the proof of experiment. 



There have been made, from time to time, a number of 

 attempts to show that the sex of the embryo is predeter- 

 mined in the Qgg, and is not determined later by external 

 circumstances. In recent years this view has come more to 

 the front, despite the apparent experimental evidence which 

 seemed in one or two cases to point to the opposite view. 

 One of the most complete analyses of the question is that 

 of Cuenot, who has attempted to show that the sex of the 

 embryo is determined in the egg, before or at the time of 



