BIBLIOGRAPHY 95 



Kasapligil, B.: Morphological and ontogenetic studies of Urnbellularia calif ornica 



Nutt. and Laurus nohilis L., Univ. Calif. Piibl. Bot., 25: 115-240, 1951. 

 Kaussmann, B.: Vergleichende Untersuchungen iiber die Blattnatur der Kelch-, 



Blumen-, und Staubbliitter, Bot. Archiv, 42: 503-572, 1941. 

 Kozo-Poljanski, B.: On some "third" conceptions in floral morphology, New Phijt., 



35: 479-492, 1936. 

 Leppik, E. E.: The form and function of numerical patterns in flowers. Am. Jour. 



Bot, 43: 445^55, 1956. 

 Martens, P.: La grain et le tube poUinique: Reflexions sur les caracteres propres des 



phanerogames, Acad. Roy. Belg. Bull. CI. Sci., 5 ser., 33: 919-943, 1948. 

 Mason, H. L. : The concept of the flower and the theory of homology. Madrono, 



14: 81-95, 1957. 

 Mathews, J. R.: Floral morphology and its bearing on the classification of angio- 



sperms. Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh, 23: 69-82, 1941. 

 Nast, C. G.: The comparative morphology of the Winteraceae. VI. Vascular 



anatomy of the flowering shoot, ]otir. Arnold Arb., 25: 454-466, 1944. 

 Neumayer, H.: Die Geschichte der Bliite, Abliand. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, 14: 



1-112, 1921. 

 Ozenda, P.: Recherches sur les dicotyledones apocarpiques, Publ. Lab. £cole Norm. 



Sup., ser. biol. II, Paris, pp. 1-183, 1949. 

 Parkin, J.: The unisexual flower: a criticism, Phtjtomorph., 2: 75-79, 1952. 



: The unisexual flower again — a criticism, Phytomnrph., 7: 7-9, 1957. 



: The strobilus theory, Proc. Linn. Soc. London, 135: 51-64, 1922. 



Payer, J. B.: "Traite d'Organogenie Comparee de la Fleur," Paris, 1857. 

 Plantefol, L.: Fondements d'une theorie florale nouvelle: L'ontogenie de la fleur, 



Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., 11 ser., 9: 35-186, 1948. 

 Rauh, W., and H. Reznik: Histogenetische Untersuchungen an Bliiten- und Inflores- 



zenzenachsen. I. Die histogenese becherformiger Bliiten und Infloreszenzenach- 



sen sowie der Bliitenachsen der Rosoideen, Sitzber. Heidelb. Akad. Wiss. Math.- 



Nat. Kl, 1951: .3-71. 

 Sargant, E.: The reconstruction of a race of primitive angiosperms, Ann. Bot., 22: 



121-186, 1908. 

 Sporne, K. R.: Correlation and classification in dicotyledons, Proc. Linn. Soc. Lon- 

 don, 160: 40-47, 1948. 

 — : A new approach to the problem of the primitive flower. New Phyt., 48: 



259-276, 1949. 



Statistics and evolution of dicotyledons, Evol, 8: 55-64, 1954. 



Stebbins, G. L., Jr.: Natural selection and the differentiation of angiosperm 



famihes, Evol, 5: 299-324, 1951. 

 Thompson, J. M.: Studies in advancing sterility. VII. The state of flowering known 



as angiospermy. Hartley Bot. Lab. Liverpool Publ. 12, 1934. 

 : Towards a modem physiological interpretation of flowering, Proc. Linn. 



Soc. London, 156: 46-69, 1943^4. 

 Troll, W.: "Organization und Gestalt im Bereich der Blute," Berlin, 1928. 

 Van Tieghem, P.: Recherches sur la structure du pistil et sur I'anatomie comparee 



de la fleur, Mem. Sav. Acad. Sci. Imp. France, 21: 1-261, 1875. 

 Vautier, S.: La vascularisation florale chez les Polygonacees, Candollca, 12: 219- 



341, 1949. 

 Wilkinson, A. M.: The floral anatomy and morphology of some species of Cornus 



and of the Caprifoliaceae, Thesis, Cornell University, 1945. 

 Wilson, C. L., and T. Just: The morphology of the flower, Bot. Rev., 5: 97-131, 



1939. 



