PLATE X. 



Fig. 1. E. cavatica, female, X 2. See Plate XI. (Page 185.) 



Fig. 2. E. cavatica, male, x 2. 



Fig. 3. E. angulata (bicentennaria), XI. See Plate XL (Page 186.) 



Fig. 4. E. angulata (bicentennaria), X4, young specimen. 



Fig. 5. E. angulata (bicentennaria), immature male. 



Fig. 6. E. gemma, x i. See Plates IX., XI. (Page 182.) 



Fig. 7. E. reticulata,' female, X2, new species. See Plate XL, Fig. 7. 



Fig. 8. E. recticulata, male, x 2. See Plate XL, Fig. 8. 



Fig. 9. E. silvatica, female, X1.5. See Plate XL (Page 188) 



Fig. 10. E. diademata, female, X 1. See Plate XL (Page 188.) 



Fig. 11. E. gemma, female, X 1.5. (Page 182.) 



' When writing the descriptive text of this species I classified it with E. mlniata (page 177), which 

 it closely resembles, having at that time concluded that I was wrong in treating it as a new species. Sub- 

 sequent study led me to think the specimen different from E. miniata, and I therefore retain my original 

 name of the species in the plates, although too late to make proper correction and description in the text 

 itself. 



(326) 



