CONSTANCE: SYSTEMATICS OF THE ANGIOSPERMS 465 



Heimsch, C. Jr. (Cont.) 



1940. Wood anatomy and pollen morphology of Rhus and allied genera. Journ. Arnold 

 Arbor., 27:279-291. 



1942. Comparative anatomy of the secondary xylem in the "Gruinales" and "Tere- 

 binthales," of Wettstein with refei-ence to taxouomic grouping. Lilloa, 8:83- 

 198. 



Heimsch, C, and R. H. Wetmore 



1939. The significance of wood anatomy in the taxonomy of the Juglandaceae. Amer. 



Journ. Bot, 26:651-660. 



Heinig, Kathebine H. 



1951. Studies in the floral morphology of the Thymelaeceae. Amer. Journ. Bot., 38: 



113-132. 



Heintzelman, C. E., Jr., and A. A. Howard 



1948. A comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae, V. The pubescence and the 

 crystals. Amer. Journ. Bot., 35:42-52. 



Hemenway, a. F. 



1911. Studies on the phloem of the dicotyledons. I. Phloem of the Juglandaceae. 

 Bot. Gaz., 51:131-135. 



1913. Studies on the phloem of the dicotyledons. II. The evolution of the sieve-tube. 

 Bot. Gaz., 55:236-243. 



Hen SLOW, G. 



1893. A theoretical origin of endogens from exogens, through self-adaptation to an 

 aquatic habit. Journ. Linn. Soc, 29:485-528. 



1911. The origin of monocotyledons from dicotyledons through self-adaptation to a 



moist or aquatic habit. Ann. Bot., 25:717-744. 



HiLDITCH, T. p. 



1940. The Chemical Constitution of Natural Fats, xi + 437 pp. New York: Wiley and 



Sons. 



1952. The seed and fruit fats of plants: Endeavour, 11:173-182. 



Hill, A. W. 



1906. The morphology and seedling structure of the geophilous species of Peperomia, 

 together with some views on the origin of monocotyledons. Ann. Bot., 20: 

 395-427. 



Hirmer, M. 



1935. Die Pteridospermae, insbesondere die Caytoniales und die Entwickelung der 

 Angiospermae. Proc. 6th Internat. Bot. Congr. Amsterdam, 2:231-234. 



Hjelmqvist, H. 



1948. Studies on the floral morphology and phylogeny of the Amentiferae. Bot. Not. 

 Suppl., 2(1): 5-171. 



Hoar, C. S. 



1916. The anatomy and phylogenetic position of the Betulaceae. Amer. Journ. Bot., 

 3:415-435. 



HoLDEN, Ruth 



1912. Reduction and reversion in the North American Salicales. Ann. Bot., 26:165-173. 



Hooker, J. D. 



1873. The orders arranged after the method followed in the universities and schools 

 of Great Britain, its colonies, America, and India; with additions, an appen- 



