iqzo] TAYLOR SUCCESSION OF MOSSES 4Qi 



LITERATURE CITED 



i. Braun, E. Lucy, The vegetation of conglomerate rocks of the Cincinnati 

 region. Plant World 20:380-392. 1917. 



2. Cooper, W. S., Ecological succession of mosses on Isle Royale, Lake 

 Superior. Riant World 15: 197-213. 1912. 



3. Cowles, H. C, The plant societies of Chicago and vicinity. Chicago. 

 1901. 



4. Emig, W. H., Mosses as rock builders. Bryologisl 21:23-27. 1918. 



5. Evans, A. W., and Nichols, G. E., The bryophytcs of Connecticut. 

 Hartford. 1908. 



6. Fuller, G. D., Evaporation and soil moisture in relation to the succession 

 of plant associations. Bot. Gaz. 58:193-234. 1914. 



7. Grout, A. J., Mosses with a hand lens and microscope. New York. 

 1905. 



8. Oltmanns, F., tjber die Wasserbewegung in der Moospflanze und ihrer 

 Einfluss auf die Wasservertheilung im Boden. Cohn's Beitrage 4:1887. 



9. Salisbury, R. D., and Alden, Wm. C, The geography of Chicago and its 

 environs. Chicago. 1899. 



10. Shelford, V. E., Animal communities in temperate America. Chicago. 



IQI3- 



11. Taylor, Aravilla M., Mosses as formers of tufa and of floating islands. 

 Bryologist 23:38-39. 1Q19. 



12. Ulrich, F. T., The relation of evaporation and soil moisture to plant 

 succession in a ravine. Bull. III. State Lab. Nat. Hist. 12:1-16. 1915. 



13. Warming, Eug., Lehrbuch der okologischen Pflanzengeographie. 2d 

 German ed. 121-122. 1902. 



14. Warnstorf, C, Kryptogamenflora der Mark Brandenburg 1:20-25. 

 1903. 



