44 STUDIES IN AMERICAN TETTIGONIIDAE (oRTHOPTERa) 



West Point, Nebraska, VIII, 17 and 19, IX, 1 and 5, (Bruner), 3 c?, 13 9, 

 [Hebard Cln.j. 



Albion, Nebraska, IX, U, 1904, (Bruner), 2 9, [Hebard Cln.j. 



Kearney, Nebraska, VII, 27, 1910, (R. & H.), 5 d^, 1 9 . 



Lincoln, Nebraska, VIII, IX, 3, 1909, X, 1, 1909, (L. Bruner and C. H. 

 Gable), 5 cf , 4 9, [Hebard Cln.]. 



South Bend, Nebraska, X, 15, 1910, 1 6^,2 9 , [Hebard Cln.]. 



Weeping Water, Nebraska, IX, 24, 1909, (Bruner), 2 9, [Hebard Cln.]. 



Topeka, Kansas, (F. W. Cragin), 2 9, [Hebard Cln.]. 



Belpre, Kansas, IX, 13, 1909, (H.; stridulating high on tassel of corn), 2 cf. 



Zenith, Kansas, IX, 11, 1907, (H.), 1 9. 



Hiawatha, Kansas, VIII, (F. B. Isely), 1 &, [U. S. N. M.]. 



Wichita, Kansas, IX, 7, 1904, (F. B. Isely), 1 c^, 1 9 , [U. S. N. M.]. 



Shawnee County, Kansas, (Cragin), 1 d', [Hebard Cln.]. 



Barbe County, Kansas, (Cragin), 1 cf , [Hebard Cln.]. 



Wilburton, Oklahoma, VIII, 27, 1905, (Morse), 1 d^, [Morse Cln.]. 



Ardmore, Oklahoma, VIII, 18, (F. C. Bishopp), 1 cf , [U. S. N. M.]. 



Caddo, Oklahoma, VIII, 8, 1905, (Morse), 1 cf , [Morse Cln.]. 



Denison, Texas, VIII, 11, 1905, (Morse), 19,1 juv. 9, [Morse Cln.j. 



Dallas, Texas, (BoU), 3 cf , 1 c?, [M. C. Z.j. 



Manitou, Colorado, VIII, 1887, 1 d^, [Hebard Cln.j. 



The present authors or the senior author alone have previously recorded 

 this species from West Creek and Atsion, New Jersey, and St. Louis, Missouri, 

 as vulgare, and from Sulphur Springs and Raleigh, North CaroUna, and Mont- 

 gomery County, Virginia, as agile. Rehn has by error reported vulgare from 

 Brownsville, Texas (probably buUaium but specimen not available), and Rehn 

 and Hebard have credited it to Chokoloskee. Florida. The locality of the 

 latter is unquestionably erroneous. 



Orchelimum gladiator Bruner (Figs. 9, 21, 41, 42 and 72.) 



1891. Orchelimum gladiator Bruner, Canad. Entom., xxiii, p. 71. [West Point, 



Nebraska.] 

 1910. Orchelimum m,anitobense E. M. Walker, Canad. Entom., xlii, p. 351, 



figs. 17 and 18. [Ashdown, Manitoba.] 



On comparison of the female type of gladiator, now before us, 

 with the available series and the description of manitobe?ise , which 

 was based on two males, the above synonymy is clearly evident. 

 The failure of Bruner to mention the form of the lateral lobes of 

 the pronotum, one of the few diagnostic characters shared by 

 both sexes, probably was responsible for Walker's re-description 

 of the species. 



The present form has been mistaken by numerous students 

 for vulgare, particularly in the male sex, aiul in consequence there 

 are doubtless in the literature of vulgare, many erroneous deter- 

 minations of material from the region in which both gladiator 



