Yield per acre, relative earliness, percentage of lint, and relative 

 productiveness compared with Peerless, (>/"32 varieties. 



o 



o 



16 

 5 

 7 

 15 

 29 

 1 

 2 



12 



10 



8 



20A 



;]1B 



32 B 



22 



32 A 



33 



24 



30 



31A 



14 



6 



35 



27 



4 



26 



25 



17 



20 B 



21 



34 



19 



3 



9 



n 



13 



18 

 23 



•28 



VARIETY. 



Texas Oak , 



Griffin Drought Proof Prolific. 

 Hawkins Imp'd. 



Ueering Small Seed. 



Mell Cross No. 15 



Jones Re-iinproved 



Duncan Mammoth 



Hutchinson Storm Prolific. 



Peterkin 



I'ruitt Imp'd P. Prolific. . . 



Whatley Imp'd 



Mell Cross No. 3 



Mell Cross No. 50 



Mell Cross No. 38 



Mell Cross No. 14 



Mell Cross No. 7 



Mell Cross No, 58 



Mell Cross No. 54 



Mell Cross No. 49 



Cross 



Cross 



Cross 



Dickson Cluster 



Hunnicutt Choice 



Mel! Cross No. 55 



Mell Cross No. 12 



Bates Big Boll 



Mell Cross No. 43 



Mell Cross No. 61 



Allen Improved Long Staple. 



Tyler 



MJell Cross No. 76 



Mell Cross No. 11 



Allen's Hybrid Long Staple. 



Peerless (check) 



Peerless (check) 



Peerless (check) 



Peerless (check) 



Peerless (check) 



Peerless (check) 



Peerless (check) 



Peerless (average of 7 plots). 



-a 



2 

 >> . 



s 

 — o 



:!> o 



Lbs. 

 707 

 970 

 824 

 672 

 027 

 917 

 898 

 790 

 755 

 824 

 746 

 650 

 682 

 712 

 640 

 609 

 688 

 614 

 624 

 710 

 816 

 613 

 629 

 890 

 605 

 6,34 

 731 1 

 707 

 661 



t520 

 635 

 880 

 770 

 763 

 712 



714 

 614 

 735 



a, 



o 



o o 

 ® '5. 



e« 



4J 



be 

 re 



QJ 



47 36.2 



44 31.0 



45 33.9 

 63 35.7 

 48'32.4 

 58 32.3 

 52|34.7 



*j32.0 

 31.34.4 

 6031.8 

 59.30.5 

 40 31.0 

 49 28.9 



55 



52 



31.7 

 29.1 



7 

 9 

 5 



66 29 

 51 31 

 55 31 

 6230 

 8331 

 46,31 

 75 30 

 56,31.0 

 34! 29. 6 

 .55 31.5 

 48 31 3 

 58,28.0 





6128.5 



31.2 

 31.9 



(27.2 

 32.4 

 31.9 



59|.32 8 

 54[32.2 

 46 31.6 

 50 31 5 

 56 32.2 



51 

 80 

 60 

 56 

 67 

 61 



a. 



^ y " u 

 < 



a 



C5 



Lh>i. Lbs 

 256+29 



301+28 

 280 +20 



240 

 206 

 296 

 296 

 "2.53 

 259 

 262 

 228 

 197 

 197 

 226 



+ 16 



+ 12 

 ^11 

 + 11 

 + 10 



+ 9 

 + 8 

 + 7 

 + 3 

 + 3 

 + 2 



H- 1 

 + 1 



19.-) 

 195 



219 

 194 

 192 

 227 

 259 — 4 

 189 — 5 

 195 - 5 

 266 —13 



190 

 198 

 205 

 202 

 197 

 157 

 173 

 285 

 248 

 253 

 234 

 218 

 226 

 194 

 237 



—14 

 —15 

 —16 

 —19 

 -25 



—46 



I 





 



o; 









 



0) 



v 

 o 



'3 



'?. . 



~ a 





Lbs. 

 2t1 

 273 

 260 

 224 

 194 

 285 

 285 

 243 

 250 

 254 

 221 

 194 

 194 

 224 

 194 

 194 

 219 

 194 

 194 

 230 

 263 

 194 

 200 

 279 

 204 

 213 

 221 

 221 

 222 



219 

 285 

 248 

 253 

 234 

 218 

 226 

 194 

 237 



tThis plot is not comparable with others on account of a difference 

 in preparation. 



*The percentage of total crop gathered at first picking was not 



