ipISl 



/. Arthur Harris and Ross Aiken Gortner 



65 



TABLES 7-1 1 (conttnued) 



Data pertaining to specific electrical conductivity, and to ratio of electrica! con- 



ductivity to depression of the freesing point 



Table 10, Series D 



Table 11, Series E 



—0.003611 

 —0.003863 

 —0.003304 

 -0.004156 

 —0.003081 

 —0.004014 

 —0.003989 

 —0.003364 

 -0.003703 

 —0.004295 

 —0.003363 



— 0.005206 



— 0.005042 

 —0.004999 

 —0.004371 



— 0.004971 

 —0.004466 



-0.003539 



—0.004076 

 —0.003290 



0.002551 

 0.002431 

 0.002317 

 0.002602 

 0.002487 

 0.002126 

 0.002160 

 0.002097 

 0.002032 

 0.001997 

 0.001842 

 0.002353 

 0.002325 

 0.002087 

 0.002242 



O.002II0 

 O.OO216I 

 0.001799 

 0.002236 

 0.001693 



0.002028 

 O.OOI9OS 

 0.001923 



0.002014 

 0.001686 

 0.001725 

 O.OO163I 

 0.001592 

 0.001466 

 0.001460 

 0.001684 

 0.001766 



O.OOI6II 

 0.001397 

 0.001488 

 0.001305 

 0.001582 

 0.001296 



-0.000523 

 -0.000526 

 -0.000394 



-0.000473 

 -0.000440 



-0.000435 

 -0.000466 

 -0.000440 

 -0.000531 

 -0.000382 

 -0.000669 

 -0.000559 



-0.000631 

 -0.000713 

 -0.000673 

 -0.000494 

 -0.000654 

 -0.000397 



d, of the wall. Expressed in this way the specific gravity of the sap 

 of the prohfication is from 5.50 to 11.50 percent lower than that of 



the wall. 



Turning now to concentration, we note that in only one instance 

 does the concentration of the solutes in the sap of the prolification 

 equal or exceed that of the ovary wall. The averages are : 



