MORGAN HEBARD 133 



Posey County, Ind., VI, 6, 1904, (\V. S. Blatchley), i 9 , [Blatchley Cln.]. 



Agricultural College, Mississippi, III, 25 to 31, 1903, (J. H. Comstock), 2 juv. 9 , 

 [Cornell Univ. Cln.]. 



Jackson, Miss., IX, 12, 1915, (Hebard), i juv. cT, [Hebard Cln.]. 



Natchez, Miss., V, 20, 1909, (E. S. Tucker; in dead oak), i 9 ; VI, 7, 1909, (E. S. 

 Tucker; at sugar), 2 cf , [all U. S. N. M.]. 



St. Louis, Missouri, \T, 24 to VHI, 16, 1904, (C. L. Hcink), 4 cf . 3 9 - [Hebard 

 Cln.]. 



Monteer, Mo., V, 30, 1915, (M. P. Somes), i 9, i juv. 9, [Somes Cln.]. 



Tallulah, Louisiana, II, 20, 1910, (R. A. Cushman; under bark), 2 9 ; V, 20, 

 1910, (V. I. Safro), I &, [all U. S. N. M.]. 



West Monroe, La., VIII, 21, 1915, (Rehn and Hebard), i juv. d", [Hebard 

 Cln.]. 



Baton Rouge, La., \T, 1905. (A. W. Morrill), i a^ [U. S. X. M.]. 



Lake Charles, La., XL 13. (J- C. Crawford), 4 juv. 9 , [U. S. X. M.]. 



Jacksonville, Texas, X, 12. 1905, (W. D. Pierce), i juv. 9, [U. S. N. M.]. 



Beaumont, Tex., VIL 23, 1912, (Hebard; under bark of pine stumps), 2 9,1 

 juv. 9 , I ootheca, [Hebard Cln.]. 



Hockley, Tex., VI, 16, (F. W. Thouron). i cf , [U. S. X. M.]. 



Parcoblatta divisa (Saussure and Zehntner) (Plate V, figures 11 to 16.) 

 1893. Ischnoptera divisa Saussure and Zehntner, Biol. Cent.- Amer., Orth., i, p. 40. 

 [cf, Georgia.211] 



Material of the present species has been recorded by Brimley 

 from Raleigh, North Carolina, as couloniana, and as that species 

 (but intending lata as now understood) by Rehn and Hebard from 

 Anglesea, New Jersey. These authors also incorrectly included 

 under divisa a female, from Rives, Tennessee, here properly assigned 

 to P. zebra. 



Males of the present species agree alone with those of P. pensyl- 

 vanica in the greatly specialized character of the protuberances of 

 the median segment; in the present species the first dorsal abdomi- 

 nal segment is unspccialized, while in pensylvanica a similar special- 

 ization there occurs. The males also show the distinct separation 

 of these two species from the others of the genus, in the production 

 of the seventh dorsal abdominal segment, which conceals all but 



211 This species, abundant in Georgia, with almost positive certainty does not occur in 

 northern Mexico, a locality also given by Saussure and Zehntner. 



We here fix the type locality for the species as Georgia. The remaining material of 

 the type series is either mislabelled or represents a different species. 



MEM. AM. ENT. SOC, 2. 



