MORGAN HEBARD 93 



Knox County, Indiana, VI, 8 and 9, 1004. (\V. S. Blatchley). i cf , i 9 , [Blatchley 

 Cln.]. 



Havana. Illinois, VIII, 14. 1907. (river shore), i 9, allotype, [Hebard Cln.]. 



Pulaski, 111., VI. 9- 1907, (bluff), i o\ type, [Hebard Cln.]. 



Rives, Tennessee, VII, 27, (H. Barber), i 9 '" [C S. X. M.]. 



Lakeview, Mississippi, VII, 16, 1914. (J. C. Bradley), i 9, [A. X. S. P.]. 



Hattiesburg, Ivliss., IX, 11, 191 5. (Rehn and Hebard; under sign on short-leaf 

 pines), 2 ju\'. d^, [Hebard Cln.]. 



West Monroe. Louisiana, VIII, 21, 1915, (Rehn and Hebard; in decaying cavity 

 of sweet gum), i juv. 9, [Hebard Cln.]. 



Mansura, xAvoyelles Parish, La., VI, 21, 1909, i cf , [U. S. X. M.]. 



Dallas, Texas, VI, i, (J. Boll), i d^, [M. C. Z.]. 



Victoria, Tex., V. 25, (J. D. Mitchell; at light), i j\ [U. S. X. M.]. 



Parcoblatta notha (Rehn and Hebard) (Plate III, figures 15 to 19.) 



1910. hchnoptera notha Rehn and Hebard, Proc. Acad. Xat. Sci. Phila., 1910, p. 



442, figs. 21 and 22. (In part.) [c^, Huachuca Mountains, Arizona; 9, Palm- 



erlee, Arizona.!^-] 

 1912. hchnoptera notha Rehn and Hebard. ibid., 191 2, p. 103. [Single Type; cf, 



Huachuca Mountains, Arizona.] 



All previous records of ''Ischnoptera'' from Arizona, except that 

 of the type of americana Scudcler, from Ehrenberg, properly apply 

 to the present species, which has been confused with nhkriana 

 and '' iMeriana fidvescens.'" 



The species has not been found outside that state, the reference, 

 as the present species, by Rehn and Hebard, of Saussure and Zehnt- 

 ner's figure of a female as uhleriana, probably from Texas or New 

 Mexico, being properly referable to P. zebra, as the material now 

 before us clearly shows. 



Males of this insect are decidedly the most slender of the larger 

 pale forms of the genus; in the character of the specialization of 

 the median and first dorsal abdominal segments they agree with 

 P. caiidelli and P. lata, but have the projections there found dis- 

 tinctly more pronounced, while the supra-anal plate is distinctive, 



"' Incorrectly recorded by Rehn and Hebard as divisa. 



132 Confusion in the above paper unquestionably occurred. The references to Caudeil's 

 Arizona records of nhleriana were correctly placed under notha, but the material upon 

 which these were based, as well as one specimen from the Galiuro Range, Arizona, were 

 unfortunately listed by mistake under uhleriana fiilvescens and considered in giving the 

 distribution of that insect. With the original description are unfortunately listed three 

 males from California, representing the pale recessive color condition of americana. 



MEM. .\M. ENT. SOC, 2. 



