162 



Cotton; India No. 6. — Poor. See Nos. 1 and 2 for report. 



Cotton; Desila Koposh, India No. 7. — Poor. See Nos. 1 

 and 2 for report. 



Cotton; Desila Bango, India No. §.— Poor. See Noa. 1 and 

 2 for report. 



Cotton; Niurari Bani L. S. Kopas^ India. — Poor. Nos. 

 1 and 2 report. 



Cotton; Huigumhot Bani, L. S. Kopas; India. — Poor. See 

 Nos. 1 and 2 for report. 



Cotton; Chuidiuan Jari, India. — Poor. See 1 and 2 for 

 report. 



Cotton; Karunganni, India. — Poor. See Nos. 1 and 2 for 

 report. 



Tomato; 3Iatchless. — Soil black and well drained; fertil- 

 ized with compost. Plants set April 4tli. Quality good ; 

 growth large ; yield large. Insect enemies, Macrosila Caro- 

 lina. (Linn.) 



Tomato No. 175. — Soil same as above, and fertilized 

 same way. Plants set April 4th. Quality fairly good; 

 growth good, and average yield with other varieties. Insect 

 enemies, Macrosila Carolina. (Linn.) 



REPORT OF Mr. M. A. BISHOP, 



MADISON, MADISON 00. 



Cotton; Egyptian Bamaia. — Soil, dark brown stiff land; 

 red clay sub-soil. 



Manured with 200 lbs. acid phosphate, 



800 " stable manure, composted. 



Per acre, - 1000 " 



Planted April 17. First open August 25th, last, Novem- 

 ber 1st. Gathered in November. Quality of product — sta- 

 ple about I inch, very fine and silky and of medium strength. 

 Growth rather slow, but stood the drought well. Height 

 from 3 to 5 feet. 



Mr. B. will plant again, and although hard to gin, owing 



