54 



a way that they performed any considerable amount of muscular work 

 other than that necessitated by walking to and f romi recitations, meals, 

 etc. 



It is interesting to compare the results obtained with these students 

 with those of studies made at other American colleges and universi- 

 ties and with the results of studies in professional men's families and 

 other families. Such a comparison is made in the following table: 



Table 14. — Snininary of rexvJtx of dietary Ktudien vnth xfudentx and dietary standards. 



[Quantities per man per day.] 



Students at Randall Hall: 



Subject A 



Subject B 



Subject C 



Subject D 



Subject E 



Subject F 



Subject G 



Subject H 



Snl)ject I 



Subject K 



Average of all , 



Average of all except Subject K , 



Students at college commons, Wesleyan University: 



Subject No. 1 



Subject No. 2 



Subject No. 3 



Average . 



Student boarding himself, Wesleyan University 

 Student at University of California 



College boarding clubs: 

 Men — 



At Wesleyan University, average 2 studies... 

 At University of Tennessee, average 5 studies. 

 At University of Missouri, average 2 studies.. 

 At Maine State College, average 5 studies. . . . 

 At Western Reserve University 



Average 15 studies 



Men and women — 



At Storrs (Conn.) Agricultural School . 



Women a — 



At Wesleyan University 



At North Dakota Agricultural College . 



At Lake Erie College 



At Chicago University 



At Western Reserve University 



Average . 



Average of 14 professional men's families. 



Average of 14 mechanics' families 



Average of 10 farmers' families 



Men at rest in respiration calorimeter 



DIETARY STANDARDS (ATWATER). 



Man with moderately active muscular work. 

 Man with light to moderate muscular work . 



Man with sedentary occupation 



Man with very little physical exercise 



Cost 

 per 

 day. 



Cents. 

 32.3 

 36.1 

 41.7 

 42.7 

 43.3 

 34.3 

 62.4 

 37.7 

 28.7 

 20.1 



37.9 

 39.9 



32.1 

 32.1 

 32.1 



32.1 



31.6 

 26.0 



17.0 



28.0 

 2.5.6 



13.0 

 18.0 

 25.0 

 25.0 



28.0 

 19.0 



In total food. 



Protein. Energy. 



Grams. 

 85 

 92 

 97 

 67 



105 

 86 



120 

 82 

 71 

 58 



Calories. 

 3,108 

 3, 033. 

 3,196 

 2,789 

 2,969 

 3,061 

 3,656 

 3,062 

 2,739 

 2,024 



86 



139 

 91 



104 



111 



145 

 94 



98 



93 



96 



121 



140 



110 



104 



84 



64 



68 



108 



103 



85 



104 



103 



97 



109 



125 



112 



100 



90 



2,964 

 3,068 



Digest- 

 ible 

 protein. 



Grams. 

 76 

 84 

 88 

 61 

 97 

 77 

 110 

 73 

 63 

 51 



81 



126 



82 

 95 



Avail- 

 able 

 energy. 



Calories. 

 2,8.59 

 2, 795 

 2, 947 

 2, .566 

 2, 712 

 2,824 

 3,336 

 2,809 

 2, .506 

 1,847 



101 



133 

 87 



90 



85 



88 



112 



128 



101 



96 



78 

 59 

 62 

 99 

 94 



79 



96 



95 



89 



103 



115 



103 



92 



83 



2, 720 

 2,817 



4,188 

 2,924 

 2,992 



3,368 



3,692 

 2, .581 



3, .387 

 3,437 

 3,450 

 4,128 

 3,633 



3,607 



3,564 



2,531 

 2, .579 

 2, 610 

 2,866 

 2,970 



2,711 



3,221 

 3, 355 

 3, 413 

 2, 418 



3,400 

 3,050 

 2,700 

 2,450 



a Quantities per woman per day. The corresponding amounts per man per day would be one-fourth 

 greater, on the assumption that a woman eats 0.8 as much as a man under like conditions. 



