38 



MISSOURI AGRICULTURAL REPORT. 



The following cases have, in accordance with the terms of the Board, 

 been settled and dismissed in the circuit court. In each of the following 

 cases the defendant paid the sum of twcnty-fivc dollars and costs of 

 court, viz. : 

 State of Missouri vs. 



Alex McCabe. 



J. J. Bowlin. 



Jos. Adler. 



Ed. Olszewiski. 



Hess & Baltezor. 



C. A. Timmerberg. 



Jas. Barnes. 



H. W. Damme. 



Wm. Zeltmann. 



N. A. Quiglcy. 

 L. R. Manion. 

 J. B. Ackfeld. 

 Hy. Vandeloecht. 

 W. E. Vach. 

 John Madsten. 

 Otto Schmidt. 



John Petersen et al. 

 Ed. Eiben. 

 Chas. Lang. 

 Will Docter. 

 F. W. Jost. 

 Chas. H. Semtner. 

 Zurheide Bros. 

 Stocker Bros. Gro. Co. 



George Goener. 

 Wm. J. Hagedorn. 

 Anna M. Beckenkord. 

 Bauer & Budo. 

 Gus. Klein. 

 Chas. W. Ililf. 



P. J. Ryan. 



C.E.Sanner Grocer Co. C. Kuhlmann. 

 Hilmer-Scheitlin Com. Co. A. J. Schramm. C. Huhlmann. 



Chas. D. Kelting, Qias. C. Duemler. John P. O'Conor. 



In 21 cases an agreement to compromise, on the above terms, has 

 been arrived at in each of the following cases, to-wit : 

 State of Missouri vs. 



William Leownau. Ferdinand D. Mundinger. Chas. Deickmann. 

 Herman W. Heuman. George Goener. 

 Henry W. Meyer. Louis Meyer. 

 Fred. Heehs. Henry Fasterling et al. 



Benjamin Surkamp. John Madsten. 

 H. Bohn Gro. Co. Godfrey Wolfe. 

 R. L.Fleming. Herman Heumann. 



The last named cases will be reached some time in February or March 

 of next year. 



The State obtained judgment in the circuit court on an appeal from 

 the justice court against Herman W. Heumann and Wm. Loewnau, in the 

 sum of fifty dollars and costs. The trial of the State vs. Henry W. Meyer 

 resulted in a verdict for the defendant on an incorrect instruction given 

 to the jury by the court against the objection of the State's attorney. The 

 court was convinced of its error, and gave the State a new trial in said 

 case. The case of the State vs. L. F. MeyerhofT was lost to the State. 

 An affidavit for an appeal was made in the last named case ; but, it being 

 the opinion of the Board that an appeal had best not be taken, the case 

 was dismissed at the State's cost. 



Altogether the number of cases in the circuit court on appeal from 

 the justice court amounts to 67. Thirty-two of this number have already 

 been compromised and an agreement to compromise has been reached 



